My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10141
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
FLOOD10141
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:12:05 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:55:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
Nationwide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Guidelines for Determining Flood Flow Frequency Bulletin 17A
Date
3/1/1977
Prepared By
USWRC
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />III distribution because the logarithm of zero is minus infinity. The method <br />of combining probabilities recommended for determining frequency curves for <br />records with zero flood years is described in Appendix 5. <br />6. Mixed Population--Flooding in some watersheds is created by differ- <br />ent types of events. This results in flood frequency curves with abnormally <br />large skew coefficients reflected by abnormal slope changes when plotted on <br />logarithmic normal probability paper. In some situations the frequency curve <br />of annual events can best be described by computing separate curves for each <br />type of event. The curves are then combined. <br />Two examples of combinations of different types of flood-producing events <br />include: (1) rain with snowmelt, and (2) intense tropical storms with general <br />cyclonic storms. Hydrologic factors and relationships operating during <br />general winter rain flood are usually quite different from those operating <br />during.spring snowmelt floods or during local summer cloudburst floods. One <br />example of mixed population is in the Sierra Nevada region of California. <br />Frequency studies there have been made separately for rain floods which occur <br />principally during the months of,November through March, and for snowmelt <br />floods, which occur during the months of April through July. Peak flows were <br />segregated by cause--those predominately caused by snowmelt and those pre- <br />dominately caused by rain. Another example is along the Atlantic and Gulf <br />Coasts, where in some instances floods from hurricane and nonhurricane events <br />have been separated, thereby improving frequency estimates. <br />When it can be shown that there are two or more distinct and generally <br />independent causes of floods it may be more reliable to segregate the flood <br />data by cause, analyze each set separately, and then to combine the data sets <br />using procedures such as described in (11). Separation by calendar periods <br />in lieu of separation by events is not considered hydrologically reasonable <br />unless the events in the separate periods are clearly caused by different <br />hydrometeorologic conditions. The fitting procedures of this guide can be <br />used to fit each flood series separately, with the exception that generalized <br />skew coefficients cannot be used unless developed for specific type events <br />being examined. <br />If the flood events that are believed to comprise two or more populations <br />cannot be identified and separated by an objective and hydrologically meaning- <br />ful criterion, the record shall be treated as coming from one populationo <br /> <br />\ <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.