Laserfiche WebLink
<br />FOREWORD <br /> <br />An accurate estimate of the flood damage potential is a key element to an <br /> <br />effective, nationwide flood damage abatement program. Further, there is an <br /> <br />acute need for a consistent approach to such estimates because management of <br /> <br />the nation's water and related land resources is shared among various levels <br /> <br />of government and private enterprise. To obtain both a consistent and accurate <br /> <br />estimate of flood losses requires development, acceptance, and widespread <br /> <br />application of a uniform, consistent and accurate technique for determining <br /> <br />flood-flow frequencies. <br /> <br />In a pioneer attempt to promote a consistent approach to flood-flow <br /> <br />frequency determination, the U.S. Water Resources Council in December 1967 <br /> <br />published Bulletin No. 15, "A Uniform Technique for Determining Flood Flow <br /> <br />Frequencies." The technique presented therein was adopted by the Council for <br /> <br />use in all Federal planning involving water and related land resources. The <br /> <br />Council also recommended use of the technique by State, local government, and <br /> <br />private organizations. Adoption was based upon the clear understanding that <br /> <br />efforts to develop methodological improvements in the technique would be <br /> <br />continued and adopted when appropriate. <br /> <br />An extension and update of Bulletin No. 15 was published in March 1976 <br /> <br />as Bulletin No. 17, "Guidelines for Determining Flood Flow Frequency." It <br /> <br />presented the currently accepted methods for analyzing peak flow frequency data <br /> <br />at gaging stations with sufficient detail to promote uniform application. The <br /> <br />guide was a synthesis of studies undertaken to find methodological improvements <br /> <br />and a survey of existing literature on peak flood flow determinations. <br /> <br />The present guide is the next step in a continuing effort to improve these <br /> <br />methodologies. It revises and expands some of the techniques in Bulletin 17 <br /> <br />and offers a further explanation of other techniques. It is the result of a <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />/ <br />