Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />CHAPTER IV <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Flood Characteristics <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Floodflows in the upper Arkansas River basin occur primarily during <br /> <br /> <br />the May - July period. These high flows are caused basically by snowmelt <br /> <br /> <br />and are augmented occasionally by rain. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Methods of Analysis <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The hydrologic analysis entailed utilizing a number of different <br /> <br /> <br />methods to compute the peak flow for the four different frequencies. <br /> <br /> <br />Four such methods were utilized including the U.S. Geological Survey <br /> <br /> <br />Regional Analysis, Regional Statistics/Log Pearson, Regional Log-Pearson <br /> <br />Type III Analysis (with and without the 1957 data point), and Technical <br /> <br /> <br />Manual No.1. The results for the 1% flood which were obtained by these <br /> <br /> <br />four methods compared closely with the recorded historic peak flows and <br /> <br /> <br />peak flows per unit area from the nearby watershed. The detailed <br /> <br />computations tor the different methods were submitted to the Colorado <br /> <br /> <br />Water Conservation Board as part of the technical addendum. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Hydrologic Analysis <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The hydrologic analysis was directed toward calculating the 10-, <br /> <br /> <br />50-, 100-, and 500-year frequency flood discharges in the study reaches. <br /> <br />This analysis is based on the existing basin development conditions. Future <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />-15- <br /> <br />development within the basin is assumed to be insignificant and thus <br /> <br /> <br />it is not considered in the peak flow analysis. <br /> <br />Streamflow data from 11 measuring stations located within the Upper <br /> <br /> <br />Arkansas River Basin was used in this analysis. A list of these stations <br /> <br /> <br />with their respective drainage areas and periods of recorded peak flows is <br /> <br />presented in Table-I. The source of this data is the official U.S. Geologi- <br /> <br /> <br />cal Survey water supply papers. <br /> <br />The peak flow figures for the four different frequencies used in the <br /> <br />hydraulic analysis of this study were those obtained from a Regional Log- <br /> <br /> <br />Pearson Type III Analysis (including the 1957 data point). The 1957 peak <br /> <br />flow for the South Arkansas River was obtained from a set of correlations <br /> <br /> <br />that resulted in a relationship obtained from the period of common records <br /> <br /> <br />between the South Arkansas River near Salida and the Arkansas River at <br /> <br /> <br />Salida. A set of graphs were developed showing the drainage area in square <br /> <br /> <br />miles versus peak flow for the four different frequencies. The data from the <br /> <br /> <br />eleven gaging stations were used initially to plot such graphs. Based on <br /> <br />further analysis of the different drainage basins, it was determined that <br /> <br /> <br />the final plots of such graphs would be based on the data from the gaging <br /> <br /> <br />stations representative of the study area. The results were plotted and <br /> <br /> <br />are presented in Figure-I. <br /> <br />Using Figure-l and the drainage areas upstream of the reaches for <br /> <br />Poncha Creek and the South Arkansas River, peak flows for the four different <br /> <br /> <br />frequencies were obtained. The values for such flows are presented in <br /> <br /> <br />Table-2. <br /> <br />-16- <br />