Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />On September 27, the median dissolved oxygen concentra- <br />tion at 10 sites in the Lumber River Basin was 5.2 mg/L <br />with a minimum of 1.3 mglL; the median concentration in <br />the Waccamaw River Basin was 2.55 mg/L with concentra- <br />tions at all 6 sites less than or equal to 2.7 mg/L. Also on <br />September 27, the median dissolved oxygen concentration <br />measured at 16 sites in the Tar River Basin was 4.5 mg/L <br />with a minimum concentration of O. I 7 mg/L, and a maxi- <br />mum concentration of 8,07 mglL at Rocky Mount, which <br />is where the USGS measured the maximum dissolved <br />oxygen concentration in the Tar River. On September 28, <br />at 1 I sites in the Chowan River Basin, the median <br />dissolved oxygen concentration was 2.5 mglL and the <br />minimum concentration was 1.2 mglL. <br />Although dissolved oxygen concentrations were quite <br />low, the sustained hypoxic conditions that occurred in <br />floodwaters from Hurricane Fran did not occur after Hurri- <br />cane Floyd (table 7). These somewhat higher dissolved <br />oxygen concentrations that occurred in Hurricane Floyd <br />floodwaters may have been the result of one or a combination of the <br />following factors: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br />w <br />" <br />" <br />z <br /> <br />Farm surroundt'd by floodwaters <br /> <br />Air temperatures following Hurricane Floyd were somewhat cooler <br />than after Hurricane Fran. <br />Higher and more sustained flows after Hurricane Floyd provided <br />greater dilution of oxygen-consuming materials. <br />Slower recession of Hurricane Floyd floodwaters resulted in a more <br />gradual delivcry of organic matter from the floodplain to the river <br />than during Hurricane Fran flooding. <br /> <br />- - - - --- - - - --.. -"""'Ili"IiII <br />Table 7. Dissolved oxygen concentrations, in milligrams per liter, at <br />selected sites in the Neuse and Cape Fear River Basins, N.C., <br />approximateiy 5 days following the passages of Hurricanes Floyd (1999) <br />r and Fran (1996) <br />[-, no data] <br /> <br />Site no. <br />(fig. 13) <br /> <br />Hurricane Floyd <br />Sepl. 16--17. 1999 <br />(sampled <br />St"pf. 20-21,1999) <br />7.5 <br />4.9 <br /> <br />Stalionname <br /> <br />22 <br />23 <br />27 <br />28 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Neuse River near Clayton <br />Neuse River at Smithfield <br />Ncuse River near Goldsburo <br />Neuse River at Kinston <br />Contcntnea Creek at Hookertan <br />Cape Fear River at Lock 1 <br /> <br />2.8 <br />2.9 <br />4.4 <br /> <br />~- <br /> <br />HurrlcllDefo'raD <br />Sept. 5-4i, 1996 <br />(sampled <br />Sept. 10, 1996) <br />5.0 <br />3.8 <br />0.4 <br />0.9 <br />1.0 <br />2.5 <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Specific conductance values were <br />low comparcd to previous records (table <br />8) indicating the effects of dilution from <br />the floodwaters of Hurricane Floyd. <br />Likewise, pH values were about 0.5 to <br />1.0 standard units lower than typical <br />values measured during the previous <br />9-year record. The lower pH likely was <br />the result of the large volume of rainfall <br />during September and October; rainfall <br />typically has a pH of about 4.5 in eastern <br />North Carolina (National Atmospheric <br />Deposition Program, 1999), Measure- <br />ments of pH ranged from 4.4 in the Lum- <br />ber River on September 21 and 23 to <br />about 6.5 at several locations in the Tar <br />River on October 5. <br /> <br />Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and <br />Organic Carbon <br /> <br />For three of the five sites for <br />which comparisons could be made <br />(table 8), maximum ammonia concen- <br />trations measured in floodwaters were <br />approximately equal to the median con- <br />centrations rneasured from January <br />1990 to August 1999, and certainly <br /> <br />Two Months of Flooding in Eastern i\orth Carolina. September-October ]999 <br />