Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Floods can transport tremendous <br />quantities of material from the land <br />surface into the stream system, inun- <br />date areas that are contaminated with <br />a variety of substances, flood <br />wastewater-treatment facilities that <br />may be located in or near the flood- <br />plain, and result in the failure of <br />animal waste lagoons. The large <br />volume of water transported during <br />the Hurricane Floyd flooding <br />demonstrated that even low concen- <br />trations of pollutants ean result in the <br />transport of extremely high loads (or <br />mass) of these materials through the <br />stream system and ultimately to the <br />estuaries of eastern North Carolina. <br />The somewhat <br />limited water- <br />quality sampling <br />that was con- <br />ducted following <br />Hurricane Fran <br />(Bales and <br />Childress, 1996) <br />proved to be very <br />informative <br />because little is <br />known about <br />water-quality <br />conditions during <br />extremely large <br />floods, Water- <br />quality samples <br />were collected <br />during the flood- <br />ing that followed <br />Hurricane Floyd <br />in order to better <br />document and <br />understand the <br />transport of nutri- <br />ents, metals, pes- <br />ticides, and other <br />34' <br />pollutants during <br />extreme floods; to <br />document load- <br /> <br /> <br />ings of pollutants transported to the <br />coastal waters; to compare Hurricane <br />Floyd water-quality conditions with <br />those resulting from Hurricane Fran; <br />and to provide a basis for understand- <br />ing possible future environmental <br />changes (such as aecelerated estua- <br />rine eutrophication) that may result <br />from the floods, <br />Floodwater-quality samples were <br />collected at 15 sites (fig, 13; table 6) <br />beginning on September 16, 1999, <br />following the passage of Hurricane <br />Floyd through the State, and continu- <br />ing through October 5, 1999. Five <br />sites on the Tar River from Tar River <br />(site 7) to Greenville (site 16) were <br /> <br />80' <br /> <br />79' <br /> <br />78' <br /> <br />sampled; five sites were sampled on <br />the mainstem of the Neuse River <br />from Clayton (site 22) to Fort Barn- <br />well (site 32) and two Neuse River <br />tributary sites were sampled; the <br />Cape Fear River at Lock I (site 40) <br />was sampled, as were the Northeast <br />Cape Fear River near Chinquapin <br />(site 43) and the Lumber River at <br />Boardman (site 45). Samples were <br />collected on the day ofthe peak <br />discharge on the Tar River from <br />Louisburg to Greenville (sites 8, 9, <br />and 16), except at Tarboro (site 14), <br />where the first sample was collected <br />2 days after the peak at 93 percent of <br />the peak discharge, The Tar River <br /> <br />77' <br /> <br />76' <br /> <br />37' <br /> <br />36' <br /> <br />35' <br /> <br />Figure 13. Sites at which water-quality samples were collected by the USGS in September-October <br />1999, following Hurricane Fioyd, <br /> <br />Two Months of Flooding in Eastern North Carolina. September-Dctober 1999 <br />