My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10104
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
FLOOD10104
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:11:56 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:52:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Alamosa
Community
Alamosa
Stream Name
Rio Grande
Basin
Rio Grande
Title
Riverwood Estates Subdivision Rio Grande Floodway Evaluation
Date
4/3/1987
Prepared For
Alamosa
Prepared By
Muller Engineering Company, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />RELOCATED FLOODWAY <br /> <br /> <br />rn addition to mitigating the impact of the fill material placed <br />within the floodway, the City may also want to consider relocating the <br />regulatory floodway line through the Riverwood Estates area to an <br />alignment along the bank line. This relocation would be consistent <br />with the downstream floodway limits. Relocating the floodway would <br />permit a large part of the subdivision to become compliant with the <br />floodway regulations of the NFrp. The suggested relocated floodway <br />line is shown on Sheet 1. <br /> <br />The impact of moving the floodway on adjoining properties was <br />determined for each of the suggested mitigation measures discussed in <br />the previous section. The hydraulic model was changed in each case to <br />consi der the floodway 1 i ne to be along the top of the ti ght bank <br />through Riverwood Estates. <br /> <br />For the excavated opposite bank condition, moving the floodway would <br />cause a rise of up to approximately O.l-foot at Sections 28.4 and <br />28.8. This modest rise is attributed to both the narrower floodway <br />and the computer model itself. Table 2 shows the computed elevations <br />for the relocated floodway condition with the excavated opposite bank. <br />Figure 4 also shows the resultant plotted profile {Fl. <br /> <br />For the cleared and maintained river channel condition, the narrower <br />floodway had no measurable effect on the floodway profile. The lost <br />overbank conveyance was not significant to the floodway. No increase <br />in the profile was computed. Table 3 shows the computed elevations <br />and Figure 4 shows the profile (G). <br /> <br />To relocate the floodway to the alignment shown on the map, the <br />communi ty woul d need to support a floodway map revi si on request to <br />FEMA. Additional information may be required by FEMA to approve such <br />a request. Relocation appears to be very feasible. <br /> <br />-17- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.