Laserfiche WebLink
<br />For 0.50<A~< 3.00: <br /> -10 <br /> QI0= 500 0.89 (5 =41.1, R=0.96) ( 12) <br /> AE e <br /> Q25= 84M 0.97 (5 =40,1, R=0.98) (13) <br /> E e <br /> Q50=1 ,140AE 1. 01 (5 =40.2, R=0.99) (14) <br /> e <br /> QI00=1 ,550AE1 .07 (5 =34.0, R=0.99+) (15 ) <br /> e <br />For 3.00~AE ~15.0: <br /> QI0= 830A 0.41 (5 =48.6, R=0.61) (16) <br /> E e <br /> Q =1 560A 0.44 (5 =39.8, R=0.70) (17) <br /> 25' E e <br /> Q =2 280A 0.47 (5 =35.4, R=0.78) (18) <br /> 50' E e <br /> Q =2 930A 0.50 (5 =29.7, R=0.84) (19) <br /> '100' E e <br /> <br />On the basis of the statistical measures (5 and R) of the ability of these <br />equations to predict the flood characteristics, th~se regionalized equations should <br />provide better overall estimates than equations 8 to 11. As previously mentioned, <br />further regionalization of these data could not be accomplished because of the lost <br />degrees of freedom in the statistical analysis. However, an analysis of stations in <br />the South Platte River basin is currently underway and may provide sufficient <br />additional information to refine these relationships or justify further regionaliza- <br />tion of regression results (D. R. Minges, U.S. Geological Survey, oral commun., <br />1980) . <br /> <br />l <br /> <br />The results of the multiple-regression analysis for the regionalized 100-year <br />flood discharge (equations 15 and 19) for drainage areas from 0.5 to 15 mi' are <br />shown in figure 6. Also shown are the weighted values for <br />QI00 at the 15 stations used in the analysis, the recorded peak discharges for 34 <br />miscellaneous small watersheds in the region (table 7), the maximum potential <br />flood flow in the region (Crippen and Sue, 1977), and the estimated QI00 relation <br />for the plains region of Colorado given by McCain and Jarrett (1976) for a basin <br />slope of 115 ft/mi. The results of the station-year method and the 28 nonstudy <br />stations will be discussed in later sections of this report. The maximum potential <br />flood is, of course, considerably higher than the regression relations given by <br />equations 15 and 19. The relation developed by McCain and Jarrett (1976) gener- <br />ally is in close agreement with the regression results, except for drainage areas <br />less than about 2 mi' where their estimates of peak discharge are as much as <br />100 percent higher for a 1 mi' basin. Figure 6 shows frequency of occurrence <br />for about 14 of the 34 floods on miscellaneous watersheds was greater than 100 <br />years according to equations 15 and 19. <br /> <br />21 <br />