Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The correlation coefficient, root mean square error, and slope of the regress- <br />ion line between recorded and synthetic peak discharges for the calibration of <br />each site, all of which are measures of the relative success of the calibration, <br />also are given in table 6. The relation between recorded and synthetic peak <br />discharge for all 141 floods used in the calibration process is shown in figure 5. <br />This relation has a correlation coefficient of 0.90 and the slope of the regression <br />I ine is 0.93. These statistics indicate the overall model-cal ibration phase was <br />successful and unbiased. However, stations 07126450 and 07129100 had statistically <br />unsuccessful calibrations and were not used in the synthesis phase of the model- <br />ing process. Station 07126450 had calibration statistics indicating a low correla- <br />tion coefficient (O.56), a high root mean square error (J100 percent), and the <br />slope of the regression line was considerably less than 1.00 (0.47). Based on <br />only three storms, the slope of the regression line for station 07129100 was con- <br />siderably greater than 1.00 (3.20). <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Synthesis of Long-Term Annual Flood Series <br /> <br />Recorded rainfall-runoff data were used to "calibrate" the infiltration, soil- <br />moisture, and flow-routing parameters in the model for the 15 basins. Long-term <br />daily rainfall, daily evaporation, and unit (5-min time interval) storm rainfall were <br />then used as input to the calibrated rainfall-runoff model of each basin to gener- <br />ate synthetic peak discharges and flood volumes for each historical storm period. <br /> <br />The following National Weather Service climatological stations provided the <br />climatic data required by the synthesis phase of the modeling process: <br /> <br />Denver, Colo. {station 2220)------------------------rainfal I, 1898-1970 <br />John Martin Dam, Colo. (station 4388)------------evaporation, 1950-1975 <br />Pueblo, Colo. (station 6740)------------------------rainfal I, 1900-1969 <br />Pueblo City Reservoir, Golo.(station 6743)-------evaporation, 1950-1975 <br />Amari 110, Tex. (station 23047)----------------------rainfall, 1914-1974 <br />Wichita Falls, Tex. {station 13966)--------------evaporation, 1950-1974 <br /> <br />Rainfall data consisted of both daily rainfall for the indicated period and unit <br />storm rainfall for the three to five greatest storms occurring in each of these <br />years. It was assumed that one of these three to five storms would produce the <br />annual peak discharge, although this peak discharge would not necessarily be <br />associated with the greatest total rainfall. Evaporation data consisted of seasonal <br />daily pan evaporation for the indicated period. To be compatible with the long- <br />term rainfall data, daily pan evaporation for the period prior to 1950 was synthe- <br />sized based on 3-day moving averages calculated from the observed evaporation <br />data for the 1950 through 1975 period. Denver and Pueblo long-term rainfall was <br />used along with either John Martin Dam or Pueblo City Reservoir evaporation, <br />while Amarillo long-term rainfall was used along with Wichita Falls evaporation. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />14 <br />