My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10102
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
FLOOD10102
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:11:55 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:52:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Rainfall-Runoff Modelling and Preliminary Regional Flood Characteristics of Small Rural Watersheds in Arkansas River Basin - Colorado
Date
1/1/1981
Prepared For
CDOT
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Although nonuniform rainfall distribution, rainfall intensity and duration, <br />and soil-moisture conditions result in variations in runoff volume for floods of the <br />same magnitude, a relation between peak discharge and flood volume was deter- <br />mined from the 61 largest flood-hydrographs recorded at the 17 sites. These <br />hydrographs were characteristically the result of short-duration, high-intensity <br />rainfall typical of convective storms or thunderstorms, but not typical of <br />frontal-type storms. For these events, peak discharges ranged from 53 to 3,300 <br />ft3/S and flood volumes ranged from 3 to 150 acre-ft. The relation is: <br /> <br />V=0.112Qp 0.922 <br /> <br />(S =60, R=0.79) <br />e <br /> <br />(1) <br /> <br />where: <br /> <br />V=flood volume, in acre-feet; <br /> <br />Qp=peak discharge, in cubic feet per second; <br />S =average standard error of estimate, in percent; and <br />e <br />R=correlation coefficient. <br /> <br />In a previous study of 105 floods on small Wyoming basins, Craig and Rankl (1978) <br />found the following similar relation: <br /> <br />V=0.131Qp 0.878 <br /> <br />(S =55, R=0.90) <br />e <br /> <br />(2) <br /> <br />Analysis of Synthetic Floods <br /> <br />Accuracy in estimating the magnitude and frequency of floods at a site im- <br />proves with the number of years of flood information on which the analysis is <br />based. The time-sampling error associated with an estimate of the 100-year peak <br />discharge based on 10 years of station data is considerably greater than if it <br />were based on 50 years of station data. For example, Livingston (1970) found <br />that for streams in the mountainous region of Colorado the standard error for the <br />25-year peak discharge decreased from 24 percent with 10 years of record to 11 <br />percent with 50 years of record. <br /> <br />To improve the flood-frequency relations for stations in this study, a rain- <br />fall-runoff simulation model, described in detail by Dawdy, Lichty, and Bergmann <br />(1972), was calibrated and used to synthesize a long-term annual flood series for <br />15 of the sites. <br /> <br />Description of Modeled Rainfall-Runoff Data <br /> <br />From all rainfall-runoff data collected at the 17 study sites, a data set <br />consisting of 141 floods was selected for use in the calibration of the rainfall- <br />runoff model. Selection of floods for inclusion in this data set was based on (1) <br />the relative compatibility of rainfall totals or intensities with runoff volumes or <br />peak discharges, (2) the reliability of recorded stage and rainfall data, (3) the <br /> <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.