Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />11l68a: Data on M()untain EnVUOIllfleDts U: Franl Range, Col- <br />orado, Fuur Climax Regions, 1953-11158. Univ~rsiry of Co/- <br />orado SI"diu Sulu In Biology, 28. 16\l pp. <br />Man. J. w.. Clark, J. M.. Osburn. W. S., and Paddock. M. W., <br />IIl68b: Data on M()untain EnvironmcnUl W: Front Row$-e, Col- <br />oradG, FQur Climax Regioru. I 11511-1964. Uni~rsiry of Col- <br />oraJoS/4d,esSeriulnBiology.21l.18lpp. <br />Pcpin. N. C., Benham, D.. and Taylor, K., 1999: Modeling lapliC <br />rates In the maritime uplamls of northern Enahmd: Implica. <br />lions for climate change. Arc/ic. Antarclic, ll1Id Alpine Re. <br />uurch. 31. 130-143. <br />Wilhoms. M. W.. L()slebcn, M.. Caine, N., and Grcenland, D.. <br />1996: Changcsin climille and hydro<:hemicalresponliCs ina <br />hich.elevation catchmenl in the Rcx:!(y mountains, U.S.A.. <br />Limnolo8Y and Oceanography. 41: 939--946. <br />Williams, M. W., Bardsley. T, and Rikkers. M., 19911; Ovcres- <br />Ilrnallon of snow depth and inorganic nilrOgen welfall using <br />NADP data. NlWOl Ridge. Colorado. AtmOSpheric En...iron. <br />ment, 32:3827-3833. <br /> <br />Table 11 <br /> <br />Arclic, N1torcfic, and Alp'ne Reurm:h. Vol. J2. Nu. 2. 2000. pp. 147-/54 <br /> <br />Subsf(Jnlial gaps {>J moJ in Ille records <br /> <br />Simulation of Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling in an Alpine Tundra <br /> <br />""'. <br />_ N_ <br />AI '':nt_n No. t~7~. ~~ Au. 1~77-1 Jun 1978. II scp 1~7ll-n <br />Apr 1979. K N". 1979_!3JuI1911O <br />lit Hln-II Doc 197~. ~ Dc, 1971-1 Jun InK. ;!j j~n 19110-Jul <br />3119llO. <br />CI 290<e 11>SS--30Nn I~S6 <br />DI II~ntl>~lliJunII>S6.gi'l<'vll>77_IIJunI97g <br /> <br />Alexis H. Conley, '" <br />Elisabeth A. Holland, t <br />T. R. Seastedt,t. and <br />W. J, ParlOn~ <br /> <br />, <br />J <br /> <br />Abslrlld <br /> <br />SimulD.tions of an D.lpine tundra ecosystem using the CENTURY ecosystelll model <br />were condllcted to test model descriptiolls of <:arbon D.rI.d nilrogen cyclinil and to <br />cxplore the alpine ecosystem response to physical and chemical components of <br />global chD.llge. The pnramc:terizD.tion of the alpine lundra for CENTURy was <br />updated to reflect currenl knowledge of the site. and sensitivity analyses were <br />conducled. Verilic:uion of resull~ from a 6-yr fertilization experiment in the alpine <br />tested Ihe predictive capabiliti.cs of the paramelerization. Simulations With tn- <br />creased winler precipitation and wilh the chmale predicted under doubled atmo- <br />spheric carbon dioxide concenl11llions were tll.en conducted. <br />Modifications 10 the pacD.meterization necessary to uescribe carbon D.Ild ni- <br />trogen cycling included decreasing the C;N ratios ofplD.llt tissues. increasing the <br />amount of mtrogen relranslocated at Ihe end of the growing scason, elltending <br />the length of the growing season, and lowering the rate of decomposition. The <br />updated parameterization requires 30% greater thllP observed inputs of nel pri- <br />mary productivity to simulate observed level$ of 10lal soil carbon suggesling Ihal <br />soil carbon sequestralion is. not well represented in the model. Carbon and nitro" <br />gen cycling showed greatest sensitivity to the length of the growing season D.Ild <br />10 the temperD.ture regulation of de<:omposition. Simula.lion of the nitrogen fertil- <br />ization experiment resulted in II % greater productivity thllP observed empirically. <br />a reasonable verification of the updaled parameterization. The major impact from <br />increasing winler precipilation was a 30% increase in the D.mount of nitrogen in <br />SlrCiIlU flow. Simulation with the climate predicted for a doubling of cunent car- <br />bon dio:tide levels reduced production 10% while tOlal sot! carbon remained con- <br />Stant. nus response was largely controlled by redUCed soil mOISture dunng the <br />growing season. <br /> <br /> <br />Ms submined MIJY 1999 <br /> <br />Appendix 1: Delllils of Dala Hallldling <br /> <br />DiffelCnces in mean daily maxima and minima bclwccn the <br />two instnJllIl:nts (hygrothermovaph and datapod) " sites A I and <br />B I in turTl were calClllated usin& the overlapping d&IL "Ibcrc <br />was 00 strong seasonal pllucm to the diffcrmea (Table 10) and <br />the mean oorrcctiGllS listed were spplied 10 the dalapOd dal.l. <br />Corrections arc broadly similar at Al and BI. Both maximum <br />ilIld miuimullllempcratW"es arc underestimated by Ihc datapod <br />in cGmpanson with the hygrothennopllph. altbouah differences <br />in[llinimaarcs[llaU(<O.I"C).~lIIlIallyrcaetrela_ <br />lively ~lowly to rapid temperalUre chanacs and reJlslCr a teduccd <br />diurnal temperature range (Marr. 1%7: Docskc:o. pen. comm.. <br />1998). Diffcn:nccbctwccn readings will abobcrelutdlOlhc klagcr <br />sampling 41lerval of the daIapod. Daily rrw.imum aDd minimUIII <br />~mpcratures frn- tilt datapod wen: cak:u!aIcd from mean tem- <br />peratures taken every 10 min (see: SopbcrJJcullcr.eolondo. <br />edu:70111l,NiwotRida:eDaIaJ.McteorologyandClimalolosY) mean. <br />inglower maxima. AI big.h-e1evatiollS ttIIWma often (lCcur with <br />a well-defined peak. due to stronS tnOllIing in4ola.tion whio::h. al <br /> <br />TABLE 10 <br /> <br />DifferMC~t berwun dlJtlJpoa ond chart rerlliings/or each nwnth <br />al 11.1 and BJ. The differences IJre blUed 011 W period of ollerlop <br />(25 July J987-26 F"b /990 ind). All differences are gillen In <br />degren Celsius. A patlllYe IIlJllle meO/l,f Ihm lhe dQlapod i.t cold. <br />"J1wnllucJmn <br /> <br /> ^' " <br />M,m'h M.. Moo M~ Min <br />, +o,n +OA~ +0.~2 -0.13 <br />> +0,21 +I.a -O.jot +0.29 <br />M +1l1~ -0,0' H),9l +0.33 <br />^ +fJJ +II.'N +0.17 +O.O! <br />M +0,78 +0.66 +0,1& +G.O' <br />, +0,~8 -OO~ +0.43 -0.09 <br />, ."~ -a,O +0..' '." <br />^ +0.9-1 -a,ll +I.n -o.na <br />, +0.36 -0.38 +1.11 +0.2S <br />0 .,,, +0.69 +0.6' -,.. <br />N +l.J1 +1.111 +0.66 +0.l4 <br />D +06' +0.\17 ..~ +0.09 <br />,= +0.16 +0,2~ .... +0.06 <br /> <br />1461 ARcrJC. ANTARCTIC, AND ALPINB REsEARCH <br /> <br />leut in summer. is oflen cut uff by conveclive cloud build_up <br />around midday. <br />1bere arc a few gaps in !he records. most noticeably al Al <br />and Bl. and occasIonally at the higher siles (Table II). During <br />the lale 1970sespecially, records were losldue 10 the failurc:of <br />thc clock mcchanism on thc r<>>atinC drum. or failure of the pen <br />to make contacl with the chan. In other cases severe we~ther <br />mo:antU\a1 chans were leh On longer than their intended lifelimc <br />c~usin, overlllppina: traces. However. mIlCh data could be eX' <br />tracledthrough comparison with simultaneous cham al other <br />locations IUId makina: the usumption that periods of anoma. <br />klUSly cold or warm weather were correlated between ~lle~. In <br />litis way overlyr ofdala were added to the existin, Al and <br />B I rec~. lhc mu:imum difference in readings that could re. <br />suit from telldina: different poinls in the width of the chari line <br />is aboul O.2S"C (Marr. 1%7). <br />Anoltter subtle pmblem coneerns the clock mechanism. <br />which often ran slow. Midnight lines on the chan would nGt <br />com::sporut with mi<1nighl in reality. Errors of up to 6 h wete <br />found. Because of the markedly diurnal lemperature re,ime in <br />Colorado. al leut al lower elevations, Ibis is relatively easy to <br />iOenlify. This problem Will affccl minimllm temperatures record. <br />cd (from midnight to midnight), especially if ll1Inima on suc. <br />~ssin nights arc "onsiderably differen!. By assuming daily <br />R1inllna 10 occur around 6 am MDT in Slimmer ar>d slightly !aler <br />in winler, the identification of true midniJltI times was possible. <br />Masl cbans covered llIleasl a month and the cloo;:l<s arc uSllally <br />consistendy slow (they do 1101 speed up and slow down im:g\l- <br />larly). In many easc~, minima were re-rta<! using new midnight <br />lines. <br />Another concern is the vertical correclion 10 be applied to <br />individual charts. Often a large-scale correclion is neccssary <br />(usually a ffi\llliple of 10 deg F or C), as the venicaltemperatute <br />seale is displaced. When a I!CW chan is assembled the "hart <br />tempcralUrc is compared wilh the lelUal air temperature mea- <br />iured by It standard Weather Bureau-type mercury in gl~ss ther- <br />IllOffiCter. This leads to a eoxrection whiCh is wrillen on the chart <br />When disassembling. a similar procedure is followed. Usually <br />beginning and end corrections Were similar. but occasionally <br />they were nolo The: hygrothc:nnograph is II remlUkably robusl <br />inslrUmcnl (L05lebcn. pers. comm.. 1998) and any difftrence in <br />the IwoC<UteClionswollldbcduc to differences in response time <br />between the hygrothcnnograph and thcnnomeler. The hygro- <br />1hcrmojrllph's ,reltter Ill' OOt:llsionaJly results in a rcadil'. as <br />much as 20F (_I.IOC) differenl from the corresponding ther. <br />mometer rcading(Marr. 11167), especially if the temperature is <br />increasint; rapidly, ()flen lhe "uc al II am MST (the usual time <br />of chan change). Difficult cases were complUed With subsequcnt <br />"",d previOlls charu and thb oflen confinned that contr1lsting <br />ins1t'WllCnlllllag was the problem. Unusual cOlTection v:alues <br />were ignored iIrId in examples where lag was thought not 10 be <br />wholdy responsible for contrasting bcginningandendcolTC\:tion <br />values the cban was corrected by the mean of the beginnina and <br />cnde=tions. <br /> <br />"OcpanmcnlofEnvironmental. <br />POJI'IlllIion. and OrgllJll.lOlC Biology. <br />Unive,,"ityofColorado. Boulder. <br />Colorado 80309-0334. USA <br />PresentaddteSll; SSAI.NASA <br />God<btdSpace F1ia:htCelller. Code <br />923. Gteenbcll. Marylllnd:l.0771. <br />U.S,A. Alcxjs.Conley@gsf~.nasa.gGv <br />tAtmosphcric Chemi.try Division. <br />NalionalCenter for AlIoo'phcric <br />Re....""'h. Boulder, COIOlOldo 80303. <br />U.S,A. <br />tln.tjtuteofArcllcarniAlplne <br />Ruewxh and Dcpanmcnl or <br />Environmcntal,Populalion and <br />Organismic Biology. Univtrsityof <br />Coloritdo, Boulder. CoJoClldo 80309- <br />0450, U.S.A. <br />ONatllral Resour<:esEcol08Y <br />Laboratory, Colorado Sllltt Universily. <br />FGn Collins. Colorado 80523_1499. <br />U.S.A. <br /> <br />Introdudion <br /> <br />Alleration of thc physical and chemical climMC Cllll impacl <br />terrestrialecosysteml through altcration of nutrient slnrage and <br />cycles. With strch chanacs, the ability of these ccosyslCrrts to <br />sequcestercarbon may be altered re~lIlling in a positive feedback <br />to global warmina: (Asner et al.. 1997). The impact of changes <br />in the chemical climate On stream water quality is also 11 concern <br />for sites thaI serve IS municipal waler sources. For Niwol Ridge, <br />an 1I1pine tundra site inlhe Colorl<1o Rocky Mountain;, there is <br />arcat inlCrest in dclermining the effect of documented climale <br />chan,es including increased levc(s of winter precipitalion and <br />nitrogen dcposilion as well as potential climate changes with <br />inc~ased levels of almospheric carbon dioxide (Creenland. <br />1989; Sievering el aI., 1992, 1996; Williams et aL. 19116). These <br />types of allerationl may influence nUlrient cycling andslOrallC <br />anduhilllll.tely impact no.Ionly this alpine ecosy.tem bUI also <br />waler supply for the expanding down5lre;un communities of ~ <br />Colorado Front Range. <br />To re.spond 10 qucslions thaI addrcss changcs in thc physical <br />and chemical climale, an ecosystem model is useful for circum- <br />vellW>$ !he: logistical, temporal. and spatial consuainlS thai an <br />equivalenl empirical study imposes. Parlicularly effeclive ~ <br />ecosystem models in Which ccosystem funclion i~ regulated by <br />physical (prc<:ipitation and lempcrature) and cllcmica! (N depo- <br />sition) climates. Such models. including the CENTURY ecosys_ <br />tcm model developed by panon cI al. (1987) llIld the GEM mod_ <br /> <br />o 2000 Regenls of the Universily ofCoIora(\o <br />IS2).043<WOS7.00 <br /> <br />el of Rastcllerel al. (1991). have beenempl()yed to explure the <br />impli"ationsofcli~chanaclbrou,bthesitnulationofregl<,lll' <br />al and global biogeochemical cyclin, (VEMAP Membe... 1995: <br />McKlI1lc:: et al., 1991; Pul.,el al" 1998). <br />The CENTURY mockl was used lO an:alyze long-term .im. <br />ulatioll$ of increased nilrOllen dcwlilion on NiwOl Ridge (Baron <br />etal" 1994). Since then. a number' of slIIdies thai deline prevt- <br />ously unknown vegetatiOl:\ characttrislies IS well as .oiln1uogen <br />dynanucs have been publisbcd. These studies document baseline <br />value~ for nitrogen mineralization, microbial nitrogen immobi- <br />lilatiunvalucl,planltissuecarbon:nitrogen(C:N)ratios.i(Jldni- <br />trogen gas nuxes (Bowman. 19114; Neffct al.. 1994; Bowman el <br />a1.. 1995. 1996; Fisk and Schmi<lt. 1995. 1996: Brooks ct aL. <br />1996;Fiskelal.,19\l8l. A 6.yr ftrtilizahon Study lhalcan pro- <br />vide inililllvelletationre~ponse to illcrca.seo Dltfogen supply was <br />also condUCle<J on Niwot Ridge (Bowman et al.. 1993. 1995/. <br />The"," studies provide a more extensive database to evaluate, <br />improve. and verify the parameteril'3tion <>f Niwot Ridge for <br />CENTURY. <br />We dcvelopcd a thrte-pan study to evaluate thc contcols of <br />carbon and nitrogen cycling for the alpine tundra on Niwot <br />Ridge. First. we de!ermined whethcrour general understanding <br />of carbon and nitrogencyclins. asreprestnted by thc CEl'nlJRY <br />ecosystem model. is adcqllate for Niwol Ridge. Second. we test- <br />ed tIu: model's abilily to simulate Ihe production rcaponse ob- <br />se~vtd in the sh0l1-1erm nitrogen fel1iliz.ationexperirnent. Final. <br /> <br />A. H. CONLEY ET AL. J 147 <br />