Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The combined hydrograph produced a peak and volume of 200,800 c.f.s. <br />and 451,800 acre-feet, respectively. The volume amounts to 0.91 inch <br />of rainfall excess from the 9,306 square miles of contributing area <br />between Pueblo damsite and Las Animas. Listed in table 12 are perti- <br />nent data by subareas for the standard project flood. Standard project <br />flood data are shown on plate 12. <br /> <br />5-07. Fiood frequeneies.- Peak frequency curves were computed <br />for seyen locations along the Arkansas River below the authorized Pueblo <br />damsite during studies conducted for the forthcoming survey report on <br />Arkansas River above John Martin Dam. The curves were computed for <br />conditions with and without the authorized Pueblo Dam in operation. <br />The flow data were subjected to analysis using the methods presented <br />in "Statistical Methods in Hydrology," dated January 1962. The. curves <br />were based on data for various periods of record through 1965 and were <br />regionalized. After a review of these studies it was concluded that <br />the curves of peak frequency for Arkansas River at Las Animas that <br />evolved as a segment of a regionalized series of curves would consti- <br />tute a better representation than curves developed using only data for <br />one specific location. Data used in the development of the curves at <br />Las Animas are shown in table 13. The recommended curves, with and <br />without the authorized Pueblo Reservoir in operation, are based on the <br />flow data for the period 1921-65. The project document curves were <br />based on the period 1921-60. The recommended curves for the Arkansas <br />River at Las Animas for conditions with and without the authorized <br />Pueblo Dam in operation are shown on plates 13 and 14. A comparison <br />of the recommended curves and the project document curves is given be- <br />low. <br /> <br />Recurrence <br />Interval <br />(Years) <br /> <br />2 <br />5 <br />10 <br />20 <br />SO <br />100 <br />200 <br />500 <br /> <br />Recommended <br />Existing W/Pueblo <br />(c.f.s.) (c.f.s.) <br /> <br />4,600 <br />14,500 <br />27,000 <br />45,000 <br />82,000 <br />125,000 <br />183,000 <br />300,000 <br /> <br />4,000 <br />12,600 <br />23,600 <br />40,000 <br />74,000 <br />113,000 <br />170,000 <br />285,000 <br /> <br />Project <br />Existing <br />(c.f.s.) <br /> <br />Document <br />W/Pueblo <br />(c.f.s. ) <br /> <br />5,000 <br />25,000 <br />40,000 <br />53,000 <br />67,000 <br />105,000 <br />144,000 <br />216,000 <br /> <br />4,000 <br />17,000 <br />26,000 <br />38,000 <br />59,000 <br />81,500 <br />110,000 <br />161,000 <br /> <br />The change in the discharge-frequency relationships indicates an in- <br />crease in the benefit-cost ratio of the project. Details of the in- <br />crease will be presented in the forthcoming general design memorandum. <br /> <br />5-08. Peak frequency curves were developed for the Purgatoire <br />River at Las Animas for conditions With and without the authorized <br />Trinidad Reservoir in operation. Peak flow records are available for <br />Purgatoire River at Las Animas for the years 1922-31 and 1949-65. <br /> <br />20 <br />