My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD09982
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
FLOOD09982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:11:22 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:47:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Garfield
Community
Battlement Mesa
Stream Name
Colorado River
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Title
Battlement Mesa Storm Drainage and Floodplain Study
Date
3/1/1975
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
Frasier & Gingery, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Page Six <br />Battlement Ilesa Development Storm Drainage and Flood Plain Study <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />through existing gauging stations. At the present time, <br />there are no satisfactory gauging stations with rainfall-recording <br />gauges in the immediate vicinity of the site. As data becomes <br />available from the numerous environmental analyses stations <br />being constructed throughout the oil shale area, it is possible <br />that far better calibration of rainfall-runoff relationships <br />may be obtained. However, at this time, the best procedure <br />is to compare various methods to determine the most reasonable <br />set of rainfall-runoff relationships to be applied to the <br />project area. <br /> <br />I <br />II <br /> <br />,- <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />II <br />i <br /> <br />II <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The Monument c,ulch basin was selected for the trial <br />basin as its drainage basin boundaries are unaffected by <br />the develop~ent. The basin also incorporates virtually all <br />the types of land to be encountered in the overall project. <br />The gulch has an area of 4.99 square miles, a lenqth of 6.16 <br />miles, a length to centroid of the basin of 3.22 miles and an <br />average slope of 10.46%. Soils analyses of the basin indicate <br />that the soil has a moderate infiltration rate. CO'ler types <br />predominant within the basin consist of juniper/pinon woodlands, <br />scrub oak woodlands and juniper/big sagebrush. <br /> <br />The comparative analysis among the three hydrological <br />procedures vTas conducted on rainfall return frequencies of once <br />in two years, ten years and 100 years. This analysis of <br />different frequency storms allowed the relative effects of the <br />three procedures to be tested against both varying rainfall <br />intensities and varying soils and cover types. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The SCS method was evaluated using curve numbers of 65, <br />70 and 80. Th,~se curve numbers are characteristic of conditions <br />ranging from sage grasslands with 50% cover density on <br />moderately permeable soils to juniper grass with a 30% density <br />on moderately permeable soil. The sensitivity analysis results <br />obtained are shown in Table I. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> TABLE I <br /> SCS METHOD SEIlS ITIVITY ANALYSIS <br />Return <br />Freauency CN = 65 Cll = 70 CN = BO <br />100 year 437 cfs 655 cfs 1185 cfs <br />10 year 103 cfs 196 cfs 506 cfs <br />2 year 0 cfs 35 cfs 173 cfs <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.