Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />II <br />ill <br />III <br />.11 <br />II' <br /> <br />Page Fourteen <br />Battlement Nesa Development storm Drainage and Flood Plain Study <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />It is recommended that no encroachment be made into the <br />existing channel cross section without careful en9ineering <br />analyses. The velocity of flow in the main channel ranges <br />betvleen 6 feet per second and 12 feet per second. The velocity <br />of flow in the overbank areas is highly dependent upon the <br />depth of flow and the degree of roughness exhibited by the <br />characteristic grOlvth in the overbank. Generally, the <br />velocities in significant areas of overbanl: flow are less than <br />3 feet per second. The velocities of the main channel are <br />highly erosive when contacting silt-type deposits which form <br />the banks in many areas. The result is the steep cutbanks <br />and meanderinq characteristics of the river. <br /> <br /> <br />The water surface profile as calculated by HEC-2, <br />utilizing field cross sections, should be accurate within 0.2 <br />feet. The floodplain width at each actual surveyed cross <br />section shoulcJ be accurate within 5 feet horizontally. <br /> <br />Between the actual cross section locations, the <br />accuracy of the water surface profile remains within 0.2 feet. <br />The floodplair limits, however, become less precise, as it is <br />necessary to interpolate elevations from available mapping to <br />locate the edge of the flood plain. <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />For the above reasons, the elevation of the water surface <br />profile, as srown on Drawing 926.010, Flood Plain Plan and <br />Profile, shoulcJ be considered as the governing criteria for <br />establishing flood hazarcJ. The elevation datum for the <br />profile is V.S.C. & G.S. as establishecJ by the primary vertical <br />control network utilized for the Battlement Mesa project. <br /> <br />X. Summary - Flood Plain Study <br /> <br />111 <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />The flood plain limits determined by the study have <br />been recognized by the development plan and no development is <br />proposed for Ccny areas subject to inundation by the lOa-year <br />flood. <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />II <br /> <br />Although a wide flood plain exists for the Colorado <br />River throughout the majority of the area borderinq the <br />project, the flood plain has little effect on the project area. <br />All proposed land uses on the site are located above the 100- <br />year flooe profile. The existing Grand Valley bridge, which <br />provides the primary access to the site, is located approxi- <br />mately five fE~et above the 100-year flood profile. <br /> <br />II <br />