My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD09973
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
FLOOD09973
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:12:06 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:47:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Douglas
Elbert
Community
Denver
Stream Name
Cherry Creek
Basin
South Platte
Title
Flood Control on Cherry Creek Above Denver
Date
11/1/1939
Prepared For
State of Colorado
Prepared By
State Engineer
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />U. '>. ARi:1Y ENGINtERS REPORT(COHTID) <br /> <br />any natural otroam channel. create large property dwmages. <br /> <br /> <br />Furthermore, with respect to protecting the City of Denver <br /> <br /> <br />against flood damages, Cherry Creek is but one of the hazards. The storm <br /> <br /> <br />assumed for design purposes on Cherry Creek can happen over the adjoining <br /> <br /> <br />Plum Creek drainage area, and over miscellaneous areas tributary to the <br /> <br /> <br />South platte River above Denver. Such a stOnD, in that location, would <br /> <br /> <br />create property damages in Denver of great magnitude, perhaps as great <br /> <br />as the estimated damages that might result from the assumed storm on <br />Cherry Creek. <br /> <br />COLTIIEi~TS Oll STATE FLOOD CONTROL PROGR/lM. <br />1. From the foregoing outline and explanations of various plans <br />for controlling floods on Cherry Creek. it becomes apparent that differences <br />in design assumptions, giving rise to wide variations in plans, structures <br />and estimated costs, and to conflicting opinions as to the need for and <br /> <br />adequacy of protective measures. indicate the need for better formulated <br /> <br />National and State policies. <br />2. To assume that complete protection is necessary or can be <br /> <br />assured, is perhaps misleading. 17ho can give assurance that storms and <br /> <br />floods, assumed for purposes of todaY'6 designs, will not, tomorrow <br /> <br />or sometime, be exceeded in magnitude? 110 one living can say with assurance <br /> <br /> <br />what may happen during the next several thol'sand years, nor even predict the <br /> <br /> <br />climates of future centures. Attempts to span such periods, by hypothetical <br /> <br /> <br />assumptions and speculative conClusions, involve investments that, instead <br /> <br />of conserving and beneficially using the funds of this generation and <br /> <br />cent~ry, may lead only to loss and wastt. <br /> <br />-27,- ., <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.