Laserfiche WebLink
<br />u. s. BUR~~AU OF RBClJll,IATION REPORT (eOlIT 'D) <br /> <br />just above the storage level reserved for irrigation purposes. Additional <br /> <br />dam protection is provided by rock borrmv pits to from an emergency <br /> <br />spillway of 2,500 sec. ft. capacity. <br />For details of the construction fea tures and estimates of <br />construction costs, see attached drawings and tabulations .vhich have been <br />reproduced from the Bureau Report. Also attached is a map shcw{ing topo- <br />graphy at the reservoir site. <br /> <br /> <br />'ilith spillway outlet at elevation 6462, or 107-feet above <br /> <br /> <br />the stre~~ bed, storage capacity is 8,000 acre-feet. Of this capacity <br /> <br /> <br />1000 acre-feet is reserved for sedimentation and 7,000 acre-feet is allo- <br /> <br /> <br />cated to irrigation. Above that point, to the top of the dam (elevation <br /> <br /> <br />6,520) total storage is 35,400 acre-feet, thus a.l.lovring 27,400 acre-feet <br /> <br /> <br />reserved for flood control. <br /> <br /> <br />Total cost of the Castlewood Dam, including construction <br /> <br /> <br />costs and rights-of~vay, is 0876,500. <br /> <br /> <br />The B~reau recommends that ()429,500, or 49 percent, be <br />charged to irrigation (40-year interest free repayment period), and <br />::447,000, or 51 percent, to flood control. <br />It ~ill be noted, from the Bureau Report, first, that <br />whereas irrigation may use but 20 percent of the reservoir capacity, those <br />interests are expected to repay 49 percent of the costs; and second, the <br />Bureau "made no studies of flood control benefirs". <br /> <br /> <br />If irrigation charges had been allocated in proportion to <br /> <br /> <br />total or usable capacities, the irrigation obligation~ould have approxi- <br /> <br /> <br />mated 0175,000. To increase the capacity of a flood control reservoir <br /> <br />such as TIould be needed, per Bureau desicns, at Castlewood site, sO as to <br /> <br /> <br />-11- <br />