My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD09948
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
FLOOD09948
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:11:12 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:46:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Hinsdale
Community
Lake City
Stream Name
Gunnison River, Henson Creek
Basin
Gunnison
Title
Floodplain Information Report
Date
10/1/1985
Prepared For
Lake City, Hinsdale County
Prepared By
Westwater Engineering
Contract/PO #
&&
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />CHAPTER V <br />HYDRAULiC ANALY5!S <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />Based upon the hydr~logic report, a study was made to estimate water surface <br />profiles for the 10-, 50- 100- and 500-year floods and to cetermine a one-foot <br />rise floodway for the lOO-year flood. Data supplied by field surveying was used <br />to construct a river model of the study reaCh. The basis for this model was the <br />HEC II, ~ater Surface Modeling Program of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers <br />(reference 3). location of cross sections used in the construction of the model <br />are shown on the flooded area maps, Plates 3 through 8. Water surface profiles <br />generated by the model for the selected floods have been plotted on the flood <br />profiles, Plates 9 through 15, and the areal extent of flooding by the 100- and <br />SOD-year eyents are shown on the flooded area maps, Plates 3 through 8. <br /> <br />. <br />0, <br /> <br />Roughness coefficients, Manning's "n"values,wereestimatedbyf ield <br />observation at each cross section. The locations and values obtained are shown <br />in the Technical Addendum. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Tables 5 and 6 show the water surface elevations at selected reference <br />points for the 10-, 50., 100-and500-yearfloods, along with thedi scharges <br />in cubic feet per second (CFS) used in the hydraulic analysis. water surface <br />elevations 3hown are for clear water conditions. De~ris accumul~tions on narrow <br />s~reams such as these could cause severe blockage, especially near bridges where <br />the channel narrows and thereby rai3€ the surfacede"Jtions signif:CJIrtly above <br />those shown. <br /> <br />" <br />'Iear <br /> <br />, <br />50 <br />Y€'ar <br /> <br />100 <br />Year <br /> <br />A one. foot rise floodway ~as calculated for the lOO-year flood. In accordance <br />wit~ the National Flood Insurance Program, the floodway is the portion of channel <br />~nd floodplain required to pass the 100-year discharge without causing the flood <br /><,levationtoincreasemorethanonefoot. The flooctwaY\olas calculated assuming <br />encroachment into the floodplain was equal from both sides. Tables 7 and 8 ShOW <br />the width of the floodway at each reference point as well as the elevation resulting <br />from encroachment as compared to the 100.year flood without encroachment. <br />A detailed copy of the HEC-Il analYSls may be seen in the TeChnical Addendum. <br /> <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />~ <br />. <br /> <br />ReturnPerio:::! <br />(years) <br />FIGURE 4 <br />Di~CHARGE ~ FREQUENCY CURVES <br /> <br />18. <br /> <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.