Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Ideally, hydrologic studies to determine volume and <br />rates of runoff should be based on long-term stationary <br />streamflow records for the area being investigated. <br />Such records are seldom available for small drainage <br />areas, and because of the time involved in converting a <br />watershed from rural to urban conditions, available <br />records normally are not adequate. It becomes neces- <br />sary to estimate the magnitude and frequency of peak <br />rates of runoff through modeling of measurable <br />watershed characteristics. An understanding of these <br />characteristics is required for judging how to alter <br />parameters to reflect changing watershed conditions. <br /> <br />Urbanization of a watershed changes its response to <br />precipitation. The most common effects are reduced <br />infiltration and decreased travel time, which result in <br />significantly higher peak rates of runoff. The volume of <br />runoffis determined primarily by'the amount ofprecipi- <br />!ation and by infiltration characteristics related to soil <br />type, antecedent rainfall, type of vegetal cover, imper- <br />vious surfaces, and surface retention. Travel time is <br />determined primarily by slope, flow length, depth of <br />flow, and roughness of flow surfaces. Peak rates of <br />discharge are based on the relationship of the above <br />parameters as well as the total drainage area of the <br />watershed, the location of the development in relation <br />to the total drainage area, and the effect of any flood <br />control works or other man-made storage. Peak rates of <br />discharge are also influenced by the distribution of rain- <br />fall within a given storm event. <br /> <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS <br /> <br />A. Select a Suitable Site <br />I. A void construction on areas subject to flooding. <br />2. Consider erosion hazards and potential land <br />slides, especially on steep slopes. <br />3. Wet, shallow, and unstable soils are not desirable <br />building sites. Recognize and overcome these soil <br />limitations or develop these areas for parks, wild- <br />life preserves, or other such uses. <br /> <br />4. Developers should be encouraged to contact the <br />local Soil Conservation District regarding soil <br />limitations for the intended land uses and for as- <br />sistance in preparing conservation plans for de- <br />veloping areas. <br /> <br />B. Keep Site Modification to a Minimum <br />I. A void heavy grading that would alter drainage <br />patterns or create very steep slopes. <br />2. Use diversions to direct water away from erosive <br />areas to points for safe disposal. <br />3. Expose as small an area of soil for as short a time <br />as possible. <br />4. Stockpile topsoil removed by grading and redis- <br />tribute over any disturbed areas. <br />5. Use culverts when crossing streams with con- <br />struction equipment. <br />6. Protect bare areas with temporary vegetation or <br />mulches during construction. <br />7. Save and protect as much of the desirable native <br />vegetation as possible. Mark or erect barriers to <br />prevent damage from construction equipment. <br /> <br />C. Minimize Pollution of Air and Water <br />I. Use debris basins to trap trash and sediment, <br />preventing these materials from moving off-site. <br />2. Keep dust levels low by sprinkling or mulching as <br />necessary. <br />3. Place construction facilities and store equipment <br />away from drainageways. <br /> <br />D. Protect Area After Construction <br />I. Establish and maintain needed structural conser- <br />vation practices. <br />2. Establish lawns or other suitable vegetation on all <br />disturbed areas. <br />3. Maintain vegetated areas using proper horticul- <br />tural practices. <br /> <br />7 <br />