Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3.13.2 &lergy n1-'pahW's <br /> <br />WEe riprap structures are insufficient or unectIDIli.cal to control. ili! storm runoff, <br />calClete energy dissiIBtor structures (stilling basins) SIall be provided in accardarK:e with <br />lEIXM ''Stroctures, Sectim 2.2 Frergy DissiIBtors." <br /> <br />Far cu1va-ts or storm sewers ..nere ili! Froode nmiJer <br />at ili! outlet SIall be excess of 2.5, ili! lEBR Type of VI impact Rri 11 i f1g iIlsin be used. <br /> <br />3.13.3 0ECk Stro:tures <br /> <br />'Ibm! is a nmdnun permissible ve1oc:i.ty for IIBjor design storm runoff in grass-l.iJled <br />channels. (he of tOO lIDl'e camm uetOOds of cmt:rolling tOO floo velocity is to redoce tOO <br />channel invert slope, 1ohi.ch requires a chock drop to DBke up for tOO elevatim differerre <br />occur:ing ..reo ili! channel slope is reduced. <br /> <br />'Ire design criteria for the chock drops, SIall be in accordance with tre lEIm ''Stroctures, <br />Sectian 3 Olannel Drops." <br /> <br />3.13.4 ~ <br /> <br />'Ire design of bridges for ili! <kdway area SIall be in a:c.ordance with ili! lEIXM <br />''Stroctures, Sectim 4 Bridges." <br /> <br />3.13.5 Jrrigl"Hnn IlI.tch On-i'lgl" <br /> <br />Three basic types of ditch croosings of drainage.ayare defined as follaos: <br /> <br />Type 1. Canplete separation of storm flow and irrigatim flow. Type 1 structures occur <br />frequent! y as a fl\lll! or pipe crossing of a gulch by ili! ditch or as a storm sewer <br />under the irrigatioo ditch. <br /> <br />Type 2. Discharging tre storm flaos into the ditch, then I"P1"""';!Jg "exz:ess" flaos in tre <br />ditch 00ck into tre drainageway utilizing a fonml control structure. The Type 2 <br />structure 1000ld be used where tiJe ditch has Ioater' rights on the stream in <br />questi.m. In additim, the structure requ:ira1:ents for this cootrolllBY be less <br />expensive than canplete flow separatioo (Type 1 structure), €SJ"""i,,11y for tOO <br />larger drainage.ays. Ibwever, this nethod requires lIDl'e JJBintenance of the ditch <br />to cle3n rot silt, sand, mxl debris. <br /> <br />Type 3. Discharging tre runoff into tOO ditch, w.l.tlxJut returning tre runoff lBck into the <br />drainageway. <br /> <br />'Ire Type 3 structure require a thorough analysis of tOO ditch capabilities and tOO <br />storm runoff peaks mxl voltm!S, and my require a detentian or retention pond to <br />reduce tOO nmoff to tOO ditch caIBhilities and or historic flow levels. <br /> <br />Fa::h irrigatim ditch croosing of a drainage.ay will have its own unique design <br />requ:ira1:ents and therefore, a typical ditch crossing configuratim does not exist. Unless <br />agreed to in writing by the ditch canpany and the TOl/ll, mly Type 1 structures will be allOl6l <br />in the Ordway area. <br /> <br />13 <br />