Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Forest-Fire Devegetation and Basin Adjustments <br /> <br />INTENSE BURN, <br /> <br />BURNT MESA <br /> <br />E <br />..s- . <br /> <br />,. <br />" . <br />" I' ,\ I <br />.:j ~'~_JO,~ , I . "J I f\ I '~",' "'i-," I "Tt <br />.: '-.1 <~. \. I :'~, ~, , I ....... ~\ :.,.. ; - I r, - I ,-- <br />-' Ii :;' ~'''' 'v'~ :;\J'/' " .J \/\... . -: <br />~Jv ^ 'I: <br />~+: ~~ /\<> ~~....~~:. <br />... . '. \od:.VJ~,t1 '. ,l,. . " ~. , ; ',1':- -," " '';l <br />&;:-.' V}' , ,~;; 1 I r - . <br />. V . <br />... I <br />v <br />< <br />- <br />"" <br />= <br />'" <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />+ . <br /> <br />JUllnn , <br /> <br />.-sr.1. <br /> <br />1".1._2981 <br /> <br />< :~ <br />'.J <br /> <br />Z" . <br /> <br />l1Ulli1-I <br /> <br />I -u.s. .,.1,"43411!~ <br />1'_, r" , <br /> <br />!Ill <br /> <br />.; <br /> <br />!"~--~." <br /> <br />I <br />:;:.._;:o.PI.'~ ! <br />"", .----\ <br />PMI.IIO.,.U . <br />:~~ll'7I ~_,~, \ <br />J..I ...__.1 <br />lilt ---I <br />l .. 111111. ' <br />'.L" ,UIKAt 1 <br />11""UllfMI <br /> <br />+ . <br /> <br />tw111L.< <br /> <br />l"It.'. <br />".L_331X <br /> <br />/, <br /> <br />."\/-..- <br />.' <br /> <br />... - . <br /><:> <br />z <br />< <br />:z: <br />v.. <br /> <br />... <br />... <br />z-. <br /> <br /> <br />+:L <br /> <br /> <br />." <br /> <br />Figure 8. Erosion-pin data for transects in the intense-burn watershed, Burnt <br />Mesa. The plot represents changes in ground surface elevation <br />before and after the 1977-78 snowpack. The horizontal line re- <br />presents datum; deviation above the line depicts gain, deviation <br />below the line depicts loss. <br /> <br />filtration. In addition, needlecasts trap small particles which are transported <br />by overland flow and exert some influence on the microclimate of the soil by <br />decreasing insolation (Megahan and Molitor. 1975). Decreased insolation in- <br />fluences ground temperature Cl;Ild frost heaving of the soil. . The influence of <br />needlecast on erosion is demonstrated, in part, by comparing erosion measure- <br />ments in the intense- and moderate-burn watersheds of Burnt Mesa (fig. 6; <br />table 4). The moderate-burn watershed has an extensive cover of pine <br />needles. while the intense-burn essent.ially has no needlecast. Erosion rates <br />in the intense-burn watershed are almost double those in the moderate-burn <br />basin. Similar relationships occur in the Apache Springs area. <br /> <br />Burrowing animals also influence the amount of erosion over time. The <br />light-burn watershed of Burnt Mesa has higher erosion rates than the mode- <br />rate-burn watershed (fig. 6) because of a large and wide-spread gopher <br /> <br />211 <br />