Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Table 1 <br />Percent of Imperviouaness for Land Uaes <br />io the Sheep Draw Basio <br /> <br />fLOOD PROBLEMS <br /> <br />Lsnd Use <br /> <br />Imperv10usArea <br />(percenr) <br /> <br />Plood history is not readily available for Sheep Draw 8S the basin <br />has been ajMrsely developed. Flood expedence in the area Indlcatea <br />that snowmeit flooding Is uncommon and that Summer cloudbursta would be <br />the most Ukely sourCe of flooding. Flood damages are aha possible in <br />the event of large amounts of runoff from tributarieo Or omall droinage- <br />ways flowing into Sheep Draw. There are no flood control works 1n the <br />basin. Smallirrigatlondams,irrlgatloncanals,androadcroaalng <br />sttuctures provide some incIdental flood dischatge teduction, as <br />discussed in the hydrologic analysis. <br /> <br />CCII.o'.ercts.1 <br />Medium Density Residential <br />Agricultural <br /> <br />" <br />" <br />, <br /> <br />The land use patterns were alightly altered to fit hydrologic sub- <br />aress in the hydrologic model. To depict urban land use ss actually <br />used in the hydrologic model, areas with approximately 40 psrcent or <br />more Imperviousuess are indicated on plate 3. Any changea in these <br />lsnd use projections and future urbanisation boundaries would Change <br />the hydrologic and hydraulic data presented in this study. <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVE LAND USE CONDITIONS <br /> <br />The Sheep Drsw flood hazard was evaluated under future 8S well as <br />existing conditions since the Sheep Draw basin is subject to increasing <br />urban develop~nt. Changes in Imperviousness that would result from <br />land use chs.nges will affect the runoff potential. To reflect the <br />influence of changing development, three levela of urbanization were <br />considered. Existing and future urbanization are shown on plate 3. <br />Two of theae urbanization levels, existing and projected, are ahown 1n <br />the report entitled Larimer-~eld Region Land Uae Alternatives prepared <br />for the Larimer-Weld Regional Council of Govern~Pnt8 in November 1977. <br />The existing urbeniration reflects no significant urban development. <br />Projected urbanization Is based upon year 2000 land use. Thl8 level of <br />urbanization representa an intermediate level of development in that <br />11,,, <l""~Llbtr"."s I,..H or the Sh""p Dr..... n..~ln b u,,,,,,,h,,d. Tural <br /> <br />HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS <br /> <br />A hydrologic analysIs waS carried out to establish the peak d1s- <br />c.hargesfor flood. of varIous frequencieo. PloodswtthlO-, 50-, 100-, <br />and SOO-year recurrence intervala are preaented in this report. A <br />detatled descriptIon of the hydrologic analYOi8 ia contained in Volume <br />11 of this study. <br /> <br />Stream gaging recorda are not availsble for Sheep Draw. EPA'a <br />SWMM wss uaed to model rainfall - runoff characteristics of the basin. <br />Basin charocteriatics needed for the model were taken froa U.S. Geolog- <br />ical Survey (USGS) 7.S-Minute Quadrangle ~pping having a scsle of <br />1:24 000 wIth 8 contour interval of 10 feet. Rainfall values for <br />, <br /> <br />urbanhation SS8Ulll88 the entire badn 18 urbanized. <br /> <br />I-hour 8to~eventa of vadoua frequency wer..obl..tn,,<i fr"", lh.. <br />Precipitation-Frequency Atlaa of the Weatern United States, Atlas 2, <br />Volume III, Colorado, published by the National Oceanic snd AtmospherIc <br />Administration (NOAA) in 1973. The 500-year rainfall value was <br />extrapolated from the 100-year and more frequent eventa. Eepected <br /> <br />The percent of imperviousness for the land areas WaB estimated for <br />"eiatlng, projected urbanization. and total urbanization conditions. <br />Table 1 lists the perc~nt of impervlousnes8 for esch land uSe that was <br />consid~red In the hydrologIc ~del. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />" <br />