My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD09787
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
FLOOD09787
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:10:33 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:38:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Delta
Community
Cedaredge
Stream Name
Surface Creek
Basin
Gunnison
Title
Floodplain Delineation for Cedaredge, Colorado
Date
12/8/2003
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
Gared Grube
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Cedaredge is located in the Gunnison River Basin. The Gunnison River ba..in has a Iota I area of <br />over 8.000 square miles and is home to 79.300 people. There are 195 instream flow segments <br />that total 1.219 miles of streams and 83 natura) lakes. The historical flood damage in this basin in <br />estimated to total around $13.9 million to date. A historical representation of the water <br />conditions in the Gunnison River basin is represented below in Figure 2 (eWes. 2002). <br /> <br />SMr CWd"'~mw!)"""rJ~W~ <br /> <br />~~ rtIU(j <br />Amel99J <br />Bnm ~ooo. <br /> <br />._.~_f - <br />Dry A\IQ We! <br /> <br />,~ <br />"" <br />B_, <br />r_. <br /> <br />Junel~7 Se1:>1191D PoA'Y "roug~ <br />8.sm Ico<l. Bum IIoods .kJne'9M <br />B...nlloodl <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />j <br /> <br />g <br /> <br />j <br /> <br />j <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />j <br /> <br />j <br /> <br />j <br /> <br />j <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />; ~ <br /> <br />j <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />si 8, <br /> <br />ure J.Historica/ Gunnison River Water Conditions <br /> <br />In order to prove that the post-disaster expense in fact does greatly exceed the pre-disaster <br />mitigation expense. Grimm (1998) examined the 1997 Spring Creek flood in Fort Collins. <br />Colorado. This 500-year flash flood event occurred on July 28. 1997 as a result of a convective <br />storm and resulted in five deaths. 62 hospitalizations. and more than $250 million in property <br />damage (Weaver et al.. 2(x)()). In the decade prior to the flood. the City of Fort Collins spent $5 <br />million in pre-disaster mitigation efforts that include removing 86 structures (45 of which were <br />residential or commercial) from the IOO-year floodplain. The removal of these structures is <br />estimated to have saved 98 lives and $8.4 to $14.5 million. The total bill for damages based on <br />thi... assessment is estimated to have reduced the total bill by $5.6 to $9 million. This analysis <br />does not include other mitigation efforts. such as education. included in the $5 million budget. <br />Therefore. it can be concluded that the pre.disaster mitigation efforts were very much worth the <br /> <br />cost (Grimm. 1998). <br /> <br />There are several hydrologic methods that may be used to determine the peak discharge for the <br />stream reach including the Rational Method. Regional regression equations. statistical analysis. <br />or RainfalLlRunoff Models. The method that will be used depends on the data that are available. <br />The Rational Method can be used for small catchments with areas of less that 200 acres <br /> <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.