My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD09724
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
FLOOD09724
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:10:17 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:35:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Culvert Inspection Manual Supplement to the Bridge Inspectors Training Manual
Date
5/1/1986
Prepared For
Federal Highway Administration
Prepared By
Office of Engineering
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
217
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />descriptions of each number on the appraisal rating scale as well as a <br />description of each item are provided in the Coding Guide. The following SI&A <br />appraisal items apply to culverts: <br /> <br />(1) Item 67 -structural condition <br />(2) Item 6B--deck geometry <br />(3) Item 70--safe load capacity <br />(4) Item 71--waterway adequacy <br />(5) Item 72--approach roadway alignment <br /> <br />4-3.3 Maintenance Rating Systems. <br /> <br />It is usually necessary to evaluate the condition of more items than those <br />rated on the SI&A forms because the SI&A condition items cover such broad <br />components. For example SI&A item 62 covers all structural components of a <br />culvert. Additionally, the SI&A numerical rating system is not well suited <br />for evaluating minor items. Minor items are essentially limited to ratings of <br />"N","9", "B", or "7" since the other rating numbers imply a significant impact <br />on the overall integrity or safety of the structure. Therefore, a modified <br />rating system should be used for rating the condition of items added to <br />supplement the SI&A items. Since items are added primarily to identify <br />potential maintenance problems, the modified rating scale should be oriented <br />toward maintenance. <br /> <br />A sample maintenance rating system is shown in exhibit 40. The rating system <br />shown provides a numerical scale that is related to the urgency of maintenance <br />action required as well as the action which should be taken by the inspector. <br /> <br />It is important to note that the inspector basically has three courses of <br />action depending on the severity of conditions found. Each of these actions <br />involves noting the condition of the culvert components in the inspection <br />report. When no immediate maintenance actions are required, the note in the <br />report is all that is necessary. When a high priority should be assigned for <br />correcting problems found during the inspection, some type of special <br />notification to maintenance personnel is recommended. When immediate action <br />is required to address a hazardous situation or preserve the integrity of the <br />structure, maintenance personnel should be notified on an emergency basis. <br /> <br />Care must be exercised when using different rating systems, particularly when <br />combining the ratings given to supplemental items to arrive at ratings for <br />SI&A items. SI&A item ratings usually represent a composite rating of a group <br />or broad category of supplemental items. The SI&A ratings should not merely <br />be an average of the ratings assigned to the supplemental items but should be <br />based on the inspector's judgment. A low rating in one supplemental item will <br />usually control the composite rating. The inspector should ask the same <br />questions discussed in section 4-3.1. <br /> <br />61 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.