My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD09697
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
FLOOD09697
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:10:10 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:34:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
Nationwide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Mathematical Modeling of a Sociological and Hydrologic Decision System
Date
6/1/1978
Prepared By
Institute for Social Science Research on Natural Resources, Utah State Univ.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
185
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CHAl'I'ER IV <br /> <br />CONCEl'I'UAL MODEL OF THE FLOOD OONTROL DEOSION <br />SOCIAL SYSTEM <br /> <br />The sociological system like the hydrologic sys- <br />lem, is modeled by identifying its basic elements and <br />developing linkage functions among them. The as- <br />sumptions made to do so must be plausible without <br />introducing extreme complexity. The conceptual mod- <br />el is shown in Figure 4.1. The public opinion stage in- <br />cludes general socielal or cultural values as well as val- <br />ues specific 10 flood behavior. The governmental agen- <br />cies act in rational goal orientation, coordinative and <br />mission functions. Finally, the conceptual model in. <br />cludes Ihe participative functions of the public within <br />a wide diversification of interest groups, local com- <br />munities and mass media. <br /> <br />The mathematical model was buill through a <br />pragmatic, descriptive, linear, systems approach. The <br />elements in the system were derived from interviews <br />with officials in public agencies, individuals from pri- <br />vale engineering fIrms, and individuals selected ran- <br />domly 10 represenl the public. <br /> <br />Developing the Conceptual Model <br /> <br />Designing a Flow Chari of the <br />Conceplual Model <br /> <br />Figure 4.1 diagrams in more delait the broad <br />subsyslems in Ihe preliminary chari of Figure 1.4. Fig- <br />ure 4.1, however, is slill a simplificallon of the real <br />world as it represents the flow of action from one be- <br />havioral process to anolher and oflinkages between <br />the sociological and hydrologic components of the tot- <br />al system. Some processes may occur simultaneously <br />and some agencies may perform more than one of the <br />functions shown; however, all elemenls of the process <br />occur, and Ihey are illustraled in the figure in a logi- <br />cally sequential order. Interruplion of Ihe process <br />produces a recycling or feedback <br /> <br />Basic Model Elements in Flood <br />Control <br /> <br />An examination of the basic elements ofnon~ <br />emergency flood control aclions shows seven key eval- <br />uation considerations: <br /> <br />1. Flood control ability and the hydrologic sys- <br />tem characteristics <br />2. Cost <br />3. Aesthelics <br />4. Recreation <br />5. Ecology <br />6. Acceplance of an aclion by other agencies <br />than Ihe one acling <br />7. Acceptance of an action by relevanl popula- <br />tions and interests. <br /> <br />The first five of these factors are concerned with <br />the characleristics of the proposal for remedial action <br />and Ihe last two are concerned with attitudes. Each <br />factor is discussed below. <br /> <br />HFlood control ability," an engineering and <br />hydrologic factor, includes: I) The degree to which <br />a particular action provides a total solution to a flood <br />problem, and 2) the duration of the solution. When <br />combined. these two elements consider the fiood con- <br />trol potential of a particular projecl under given hy- <br />drologic and other conditions and also include impli. <br />cations for both the present and the future. Both the <br />dynamics of retum probabilities and of continuing <br />land use changes must be considered. <br /> <br />"Costll needs to be estimated with respect to <br />each agency in order to detennine agency differences <br />in considering economic aspects of projects. A limita- <br />tion may exist on the time, dollars, or other resources <br />available during a certain period preventing certain <br />potential,olutions. Benefit-cosl ratios are oflen used <br />in planning, but the factors considered as benefits and <br />costs vary with the agency and the perceplions of its <br />officials. <br /> <br />IIAesthetics" refers to values associated with <br />the appearance of the proposed flood control solution <br />and also its effecls on the aesthetics of other objects <br />or areas. <br /> <br />"Recreation" includes both recreation providedhby a proposed solution and the effect of the proposal <br />on other recreation. <br /> <br />41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.