Laserfiche WebLink
<br />NORMAL ANNUAL AND MAY-SEPTEMBER PRECIPITATION <br />1931-1960 <br /> <br />T, <br />I <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />T. <br />, <br />. <br /> <br />T. <br />3 <br />S. <br /> <br />R.IW. R.IE. R.2E <br />LEGEND <br />_ 20 _ bolines of Normal Annual fucipitaUon in Inches <br /> <br />. . . 10. .. bolines of Normal May-Seplember fucipitlllon in Inches <br /> <br />(Note ilollne Inle....ol <"..._1 <br />Source: 1 :500,000 map, Slate of Utah, by U.S. Weather Burelu, <br />Salt Lake Cily, Utah, 1962. <br />Base Map: ] :250,000 Army Map Service. Salt Lake City Sheet, <br />196Jlimiledrevision <br /> <br />Figure 26. Figure showing the influence of the <br />Wasatch Front on precipitation patterns <br />(after Kaliser. 1973). <br /> <br />tUTes increase rates of water use by planls and deplete <br />water supplies stored in the soil from spring snow- <br />melt or summer rains. Cooling autumn temperatures <br />bring changes in the patterns of air movement and <br />alter precipitation characteristics. Leaves fall, and <br />evapotranspiration rales decrease markedly. Thus, <br />the changing seasons as characterized by air tempera- <br />tures have a significanl influence on a hydrologic <br />syslem. <br /> <br />Surface air lemperatures in the Salt Lake area <br />range from an average January temperature of280P <br />to a July average of 770F. The low and high tempera- <br />ture of record al Sail Lake City are -200F and IOsoF, <br />respeclively. <br /> <br />Because of the high intensity and short duration <br />of convective stonns, only a relatively small portion <br />of the lotal rainfall infIltrates at the point of incidence. <br />Thus, surface rWlOff rales usually are high, and flood- <br />ing is common. Because it tends to reduce infiltration <br />rales and speed surface runoff, urbanization usually <br />increases flood flows. These effects, coupled with the <br />greatly increased damage opportunities, make the flood <br /> <br />protection in urban areas a matter of prime concern <br />for municipal planners and engineers. <br /> <br />Drainage Conditions <br /> <br />Surface runoff from the study area flows to the <br />Jordan River in either natUTaI or man-made wal.er <br />COUTseS. The drainage patlern is slrongly influenced <br />by such man-made barriers as railroad and highway <br />embankments. In many cases, culverls do not have <br />adequate capacity, and ponds are formed. In other <br />cases, flows are conveyed along the embankments to <br />culverts at centrallocalions. Streets with their accom. <br />panying curbs and gutters also profoundly influence <br />drainage patterns. Irrigation channels and storm sew. <br />ers also affect surface drainage. Characleristics of Ihe <br />main natural drainage channels for Ih~ subzones of <br />FigUTe 2.2 are shown by Table 2.3. <br /> <br />Instrumentation <br /> <br />The basic hydrologic data network for the study <br />area consists of two precipitation stations and one <br />stream flow gage in the rural porlions (FigUTe 1.1), <br />and nine precipitation slations and eighl slream gages <br />in the UTbanizing portions (Figure 2.7). Three stream <br /> <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />~t73 <br />~" <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />. precipitation station <br />A stream gaging station <br /> <br />Figure 2 Z Hydrologic instrumentation and the Thies- <br />sen polygons for precipitation analysis <br />within the urbanizing portion of the study <br />area. <br /> <br />20 <br />