My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD09681
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
FLOOD09681
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:10:07 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:33:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Mesa
Community
Grand Junction
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Title
FIS - Grand Junction
Date
7/15/1992
Prepared For
Grand Junction
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Current FEMA Regulatory Floodplain Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4.2 Floodways <br /> <br />Encroachment on floodplains, such as structures and fi 11, reduces <br />flood-carrying capacity, increases flood heights and velocities, <br />and increases flood hazards in areas beyond the encroachment <br />itself. One aspect of floodplain management involves balancing the <br />economic gain from floodplain development against the resulting <br />increase in flood hazard. For purposes of the NFIP, a floodway is <br />used as a tool to assist local communities in this aspect of <br />floodplain management. Under this concept, the area of the 100- <br />year floodplain is divided into a floodway and a floodway fringe. <br />The floodway is the channel of a stream, plus any adjacent <br />floodplain areas, that must be k.ept free of encroachment so that <br />the lOa-year flood can be carried without substantial increases in <br />flood heights. Minimum Federal standards limit such increases to <br />1.0 foot, provided that hazardous velocities are not produced. The <br />floodways in this study are presented to local agencies as minimum <br />standards that can be adopted directly or that can be used as a <br />basis for additional floodway studies. <br /> <br />For Indian Wash, floodways were not computed for areas of 100-year <br />sheetflow diversions. However, the complete filling of these <br />sheetflow areas may increase flood flows downstream, thereby <br />increasing the lOa-year flood hazard. For any channel modification <br />or fill in the sheetflow areas, a detailed review of the <br />improvement should be undertak.en to determine the effects <br />downstream. <br /> <br />The floodways presented in this study were computed for certain <br />stream segments on the basis of equal conveyance reduction from <br />each side of the floodplain. Floodway widths were computed at cross <br />sections. Between cross sections, the floodway boundaries were <br />interpolated. The results of the floodway computations are <br />tabulated for selected cross sections (Table 3). In cases where <br />the floodway and lOa-year floodplain boundaries are either close <br />together or collinear, only the floodway boundary is shown. <br /> <br />The area between the floodway and lOa-year floodplain boundaries is <br />termed the floodway fringe. The floodway fringe encompasses the <br />portion of the floodplain that could be completely obstructed <br />without increasing the water-surface elevation of the lOa-year <br />flood more than 1.0 foot at any point. Typical relationships <br />between the floodway and the floodway fringe and their significance <br />to floodplain development are shown in Figure 7. <br /> <br />For the streams studied <br />floodplain boundary is <br />(Exhibit 2). <br /> <br />by approximate methods, only the lOa-year <br />shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map <br /> <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.