Laserfiche WebLink
<br />rises in flow, along with concomitant sediment <br />loads, control the stability of the stream chan- <br />nel. The two principal factors governing flow <br />regimen are the percentage of area made im- <br />pervious and the rate at which water is trans- <br />mitted across the land to stream channels. The <br />former is govel'lled by the type of land use; the <br />lattel' is governed by the density, size, and char- <br />acteristics of tributary channels and thus by the <br />provision of storm sewerage. Stream channels <br />form in response to the regimen of flow of the <br />stream. Changes in the regimen of flow, <br />whet he,' through land use or other changes, <br />cause adjustments in the stream channels to <br />accommodate the flows. <br /> <br />The volume of runoff is governed primarily <br />by infiltration characteristics and is related to <br />land slope and soil type as well as to the type <br />of vegetative cover. It is thus directly related <br />to the percentage of the area covered by roofs, <br />streets, .1nd other impervious surfaces at times <br />of hydrograph rise during storms. <br /> <br />A summary of some data on the percentage <br />of land rendered impervious by different de- <br />grees of urbanization is presented by Lull and <br />Sopper (1966). Antoine (1964) presents the <br />following dat" on the percentage of impervious <br />surface area in residential properties: <br /> <br />I.of Hi~r of <br />rp,~irln,tlfll GfeO <br />(WI}t) <br />6,000 <br />6,000-15,000 <br />15,000 <br /> <br />Im!)f'r1;iO/lH <br />HI/TI(/N' (uta <br />(!)('(~(-'I't ) <br /> <br />The percentage decreases markedly as size <br />of lot increases. Felton and Lull (1963) esti- <br />mate in the Philadelphia area that 32 percent <br />of the surface area is impervious on lots averag- <br />ing 0.2 acre in size, whereas only 8 percent <br />of the surface area is impervious on lots averag- <br />ing 1.8 acres. <br /> <br />As volume of runoff from a storm increases, <br />the size of flood peak also increases. Runoff <br />volume also affects low flows because in any <br />series of storms the larger thc percentage of (Ii- <br />rect runoff, the smaller the amount of water <br />available for soil moisture replenishment and <br />for ground-water stm'age. An increase in total <br />runoff from a given series of storms as a result <br />of imperviousness results in decreased ground- <br /> <br />80 <br />40 <br />25 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />water recharge and decreased low flows. Thus, <br />increased imperviousness has the effect of in- <br />creasing flood peaks during storm periods and <br />decreasing low flows between storms. <br /> <br />The pri!lcipal effect of land use on sediment <br />comes from the exposure of the soil to storm <br />runoff. This occurs mainly when bare ground <br />is exposed during construction. It is well <br />known that sediment production is sensitive to <br />land slope. Sediment yield from urban areas <br />tends to be larger than in unurbanized areas <br />even if there are only small and widely scat- <br />tered units of unprotected soil in the urban <br />area. In aggregate, these scattered bare areas <br />are sufficient to yield considerable sediment. <br /> <br />A major effect of urbanization is the intro- <br />duction of effluent from sewage disposal plants, <br />and often the introduction of raw sewage, into <br />channels. Raw sewage obviously degrades <br />water Wlality, but even treated effluent con- <br />tains dissolved minerals not extracted by sew- <br />age treatment. These minerals act as nutrients <br />and promot" algae and plankton growth in . <br />stream. This growth in turn alters the balanc , <br />in the 'ltream biota. <br /> <br />Land "se in all forms affects water quality. <br />Agricultural use results in an increase of nu- <br />trients in stream water both from the excretion <br />products of farm animals and from commer- <br />cial fertilizers. A change from agricultural use <br />to residential use, as in urbanization, tends to <br />reduce these types of nutrients, but this tend- <br />ency is counteracted by the widely scattered <br />pollutants of the city, such as oil and gasoline <br />product." which are carried through the storm <br />sewers to the streams. The net result is gen- <br />erally an adverse effect on water quality. This <br />effect can be measured by the balance and <br />variety of organic life in the stream, by the <br />quantities of dissolved material, and by the <br />bacterial level. Unfortunately data describing <br />quality factors in streams from urban versus <br />unurbanized areas are particularly lacking. <br /> <br />Finally, the amenity value of the hydrologic <br />environment is especially affected by three <br />factors. The first factor is the stability of the <br />stream channel itself. A channel, which i.S <br />gradually enlarged owing to increased flood <br />caused by urbanization, tends to have unstabl <br />and unvegetated banks, scoured or muddy <br /> <br />2 <br />