Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The 100-year peak flow per unit area is highest in the Core Area because of the high <br />imperviousness, with values up to 3100 cfs per square mile. The 100-year peak flow per unit <br />area in the Buffer Zone is highest in basins that include steep valleys adjacent to the creeks, <br />with values ranging from about 600 cfs/sq mi for large basins to about 1600 cfs/sq mi for <br />small basins, The western portion of the plant and tributary areas west of the plant have <br />low runoff per unit area because of the high soil infiltration characteristics. Many of these <br />basins have no surface runoff for up to the 50-year storm event. The 100-year peak flow per <br />unit area is about 200 cfs/sq mi for these basins. <br /> <br />TABLE IV-S <br /> <br />PEAK FLOW AND RUNOFF VOLUME AT SELECfED LOCATIONS' <br />PRESENT DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (6-Hour SIOnu) <br /> <br /> SWl\tM 2-Year Ewat s..Year EftIlit l~Year Event 25-Year Event SO-Vear Event tOO-Year Eveat <br /> ........ Area "'I I ,I, I '" I at <br />Loatl.. Nomber (""") at '" at '" at '" at at <br />STANDLEY LAKE BASIN <br />Woman Creek 119 570 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 6 130 21 <br />Basin at sooe <br />Woman Creek at 113 1,414 10 1 62 7 ]JIJ 22 3"-' 52 "" 77 690 116 <br />Pond C-2 Bypass <br />Inflow to Pond C-2 1"-' 192 6 2 39 6 77 10 150 18 190 22 250 28 <br />Woman Creek at 108 ~880 29 9 150 30 370 78 830 162 1,100 221 1,600 301 <br />Indiana Street <br />Upper Big Dry 106 1,261 32 10 ]JIJ 30 250 53 440 84 580 109 800 144 <br />Creek Basin at <br />saoe <br />Upper Big Dry 105 ~995 27 12 240 68 530 135 970 277 1,300 291 1,700 377 <br />Creek at Indiana <br />Street <br />GRHAT WESI'ERN RESERVOIR BASIN , <br />Walnut Creek 139 154 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 23 6 <br />Basin at SHeD <br />Walnut Creek 348 "" 51 5 74 7 90 8 ]JIJ U 170 19 240 31 <br />Basin at Walnut <br />Creek Diversion <br />D= <br />McKay DiversiOD 134 550 28 5 42 7 54 8 78 12 1"-' "-' 210 33 <br />Canal at Oullet <br />Inflow to Pond A-4 169 371 87 13 160 21 240 29 420 44 5"-' 53 650 64 <br />Inflow to Pond 8-5 151 346 140 22 230 31 310 40 470 52 560 61 690 71 <br />Walnut Creek at 129 2,374 210 42 4&l 78 800 118 1,400 183 1,800 232 2,300 296 <br />Indiana Street <br />IlQ!;l\, QUlEK BASIN ~__- ---.4 <br />Rock Creek Basin 186 224 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 2 99 8 <br />atSBDC <br />Rock Creek at 185 ~862 68 19 94 24 Z70 60 660 122 890 163 1,200 215 <br />Highway 128 <br /> <br />The 100-year peak flow per unit area data is plotted in Figures IV-3 to IV-6 for sub-basins <br />with low percentage imperviousness for four ranges of soil infiltration. This data was plotted <br />to verify the consistency of CUHP model peak flow results. This is only possible when <br />comparing basins with like infiltration and percentage imperviousness characteristics, The <br />small number of basins with relatively high percentage imperviousness (greater than 20 <br />percent) had too great a variation in the percentage imperviousness to allow comparison. <br /> <br />The unit runoff is highest in the Core Area with 100-year values of 2.21 to 3.69 inches (58 <br />percent to 97 percent of rainfall), The unit runoff from Buffer Zone basins having steep <br />valleys have values ranging from approximately 1.4 to 1.8 inches. The unit runoff from the <br />western portion of the plant and areas west of the plant boundary generally have unit runoff <br />of less than 0.5 inches for the lOO-year event, with many having no runoff for up to the 50- <br />year event. <br /> <br />The unit runoff drops significantly for lower recurrence intervals for areas outside of the <br />developed Core Area. There is negligible unit runoff for the 2-year storm, except in the <br />Core Area. <br /> <br />1 The values listed arc the peak flow and volume of nmoff occurring at the downstream end of the SWMM element. <br /> <br />SWMM Model Results. The calculated peak flow and volume of runoff for selected <br />locations design points on Walnut Creek, Woman Creek, Upper Big Dry Creek, and Rock <br />Creek are presented in Tables IV-5 and IV-6 for present and future basin development. A <br />full listing of these values for each modelled design point is presented in Tables IV-7 and <br />IV-8 (also for present and future basin development). Hydrographs for various design <br />points of interest are presented in Appendix IV-C. <br /> <br />