Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The stream distances along Blue River are measured from Cemete~y Road. <br />rhe str8am distances along any tributary of the Blue River are measured <br />f-.Eem----t-fie--c-B-fl-f----l-u-e-n-c--e-- -w-:i-th--t-fle- -B-lue- -Riv--e-r--,- <br /> <br />Channel roughness factors (Manning's "nl') used in the hydraullc <br />computations were chosen by engineering judgment and based on field <br />observations of the main channel and flood plain areas. Roughness <br />values for the main channel of t~e Blue River ranged from 0.035 to <br />0.050, and overbank roughness values ranged from 0.035 to 0.050 for all <br />floods. The roughness value for the main channels of Lehman Gulch, <br />Illinois Gulch, and Sawmill Gulch was 0.040, and overbank roughness <br />values from 0.040 to 0.100 for all floods. <br /> <br />The starting water-surface elevations for the Blue River were <br />calculated using the slope-area method. Starting water-surface <br />elevations for Lehman Gulch, Illinois Gulch, and Sawmill Gulch were <br />obtained from normal depth calculations. <br /> <br />Flood profiles were drawn showing computed water-surface elevations to <br />an accuracy of 0.5 foot for floods of the selected recurrence intervals <br />(Exhibit Ii. <br /> <br />The depths for the areas of shallow sheet flow were determined using <br />normal depth calculations. <br /> <br />The elevation for the shallow ponding area near Lehman Gulch '-'las <br />determined using culvert computations to estimate the inflo~l from the <br />Blue River. <br /> <br />The hydraulic analyses for this study were based on unobstructed flow. <br />The flood elevations shown on the profiles are, thus, considered valld <br />only if hydraulic structures remain unobstructed, operate prop~rly, and <br />do not fail. <br /> <br />All elevations are referenced to.the National Geodetic Vertical Datum <br />of 1929 (NGVD). Elevation reference marks used in the study are shown <br />on the maps. ERMs shown on the FIRM represent those used d1Jring the <br />preparation of this and previous Flood Insurance Studies. Th~ <br />elevations associated with each ERM were obtained and/or de~Jeloped <br />during FIS production to establish vertical control for determination <br />of flood elevations and floodplain boundaries shown on the FI?M. Users <br />should be aware that these ERM elevations may have changed sifise ,:he <br />publication of this FIS. To obtain up-tO-date elevation information on <br />National Geodetic Survey (NGS) ERMs shown on this map, please contact <br />the Information Services Branch of the NGS at (301) 713-3242, or visit <br />their website at www.nqs.noaa.'jsv. Map users should seek verifisaticn <br />of non-NGS ERM monument elevations when using these elevations for <br />construction or floodplain management purposes. <br /> <br />4.0 FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS <br /> <br />A prime purp0se of the National Flood Insurance Program is to encG~ra?e S~a~e <br />and local governments to adopt sound flood plain management prsgra~s. Lac~ <br />Flood Insurance Study, therefore, includes a flood boundary ma~ Qesi~r.eQ ~G <br />assist communities in developing sound flood plain management ~eas~~es. <br /> <br />The NFIP encourages State and lccal governments to adopt sound ~~GG~~:a~~ <br />management programs. To assist in this endeavor, each FIS pro/iass :~G-year <br />floodplain data, which may include a combination of the follo~lng: ~v-, SO-, <br />100-, and SOO-year flood elevations; delineations of the lOO-yea~ ~~d :0C- <br />year floodplains; and lOa-year floodway. This information is pressn~ed ~.. <br />the FIRM and in many components of the FIS, including Flood Profi:es, <br />Floodway Data tables and Summary of Stillwater Elevation tables. Users <br />should reference the data presented in the FIS as well as additional <br /> <br />7 <br />