Laserfiche WebLink
<br />rock surfaces [White, 1971J, take about 50 years to become <br />established. Environmental factors known to affect the growth <br />of R. geographicum include rock type, shading, temperature, <br />moisture, and stability of the substrate, and thus they need to <br />be fac.fored into age assignments. Growth increases with <br />coarser texture, moisture, temperature. Abrasion during sedi- <br />ment transport in higher-energy streams common to floods in <br />mountain regions removes most lichen thus essentially reset- <br />ting the time "clock" to zero for lichen growth. Benedict [1967, <br />1968J indicated that growth curves are fairly constant between <br />3125 m and 4047 m (corresponding to a mean air temperature <br />change of about 6.60C) for his sites along the crest of the <br />Continental Divide in Colorado. Benedict's [1967, 1968J sites <br />are located about 80 Ian southeast of this study area. Lichen <br />growth curves have a maximum age utility of about 3000 years <br />in Colorado [Benedict, 1967, 1968J, probably a shorter time at <br />lower elevations in Colorado where climate is more conducive <br />to faster growth rates. Maximum thalli diameter and percent <br />lichen on similar rock types for 25-50 clasts on the flood <br />deposit and other rock surfaces were made at each site. <br /> <br /> <br />2966 <br /> <br />JARRETT AND TOMLINSON: REGIONAL INTERDISCIPLINARY PALEOFLOOD METIJOD <br /> <br />their relative age. Older deposits have extensive surface pit- <br />ting; rougher surfaces, and increasing grain relief because of <br />differential weathering of minerals. As less resistant minerals <br />decompose, quartz and feldspar grains tend to stand out in <br />relief. Pitting is common if present on more th.:m 75% of the <br />clast surfaces and is rare (or incipient) if present on less than <br />10% of the clast surfaces. Flood-deposited clasts are compared <br />with end-member clasts from the streambed (fr'~sh) and clasts <br />much higher On the land surface (extremely weathered). <br />4.2.3. Boulder burial. Many recent flood deposits in <br />Colorado (e.g., Figure 3) and other mountain rivers consist of <br />little or modest amounts of matrix-supported cobble and boul- <br />dery deposits, particularly around surface clasts [e.g., Matthai, <br />1969; McCain et ai., 1979; Costa, 1983; Waythomas and Jarrett, <br />1994; Jarrett el ai., 1996J. Boulder burial refers to the percent- <br />age of the total boulder surface exposed above ground. For <br />flood deposits the amount of cobble and houlder burial by <br />addition of newer sediment at the site (colluvium, eolian, and <br />slope wash) also can be used to estimate the relative age of a <br />deposit [Waythomas and Jarrett, 1994J. Thus tirr.e or age since <br />flood depositinn is inferred from depth ofburia!. The older the <br />deposit is, the greater is the percentage of these clasts that are <br />covered by postflood deposition. <br />4.2.4. Surface morphology. Formation of stream terraces <br />involves changes in the behavior of a fluvial system [Bull, 1990]. <br />Terraces may form because of a variety of intenal or external <br />changes, climate, tectonics, base level, slope, complex re. <br />sponsc, and thresholds [Patlan and Schumm, 19i5, 1981; Wom- <br />ack and Schumm, 1977; Bull, 1990). Remnants of the former <br />streambed are preserved as terrace treads. Terrace features <br />such as riser angle become muted with time by faunal, water, <br />and wind action, and rates of change depend On factors such as <br />cohesion of material, vegetation, and flow stress [Lewin, 1978; <br />Birkeland et al., 1979]. Younger terraces tend ta be more an- <br />gular and have steep slopes; with increasing age, terrace scarp <br />slopes become flatter unless maintained by cut-bank erosion. <br />Along rivers in glaciated basins in the Yamp 1 River basin, <br />early Holocene to late Pleistocene terraces, which are 1-2 In <br />above the present floodplain, are covered with eolian (loess) <br />deposits [Madole, 1991aJ. These surfaces are relatively easily <br />erodible if flooded thus providing unique sites for paleoflood <br />investigations. Over time, local hillslope runoff produces trans- <br />verse gullies or channels on terraces and colluvial surfaces; <br />greater development generally requires longer time. Also, if <br />alluvial (or colluvial) surfaces are inundated by flood waters, <br />microchannels and surface deposits are prodt: ced longitudi. <br />nally, which are somewhat similar to crevasse channels and <br />splays [Lewin, 1978J. With time, geomorphic expression of <br />these features is muted. Lack of such flood features or noni- <br />nundation surfaces [Jarrett and Costa, 1988; Levish el al., 1994; <br />Ostenaa attd Levish, 1995J provides an upper bound of flood <br />height on a surface of known age. <br />4.2.5. Lichenometry. A common RD technique used for <br />dating glacial deposits is lichenometry [Benedict, 1966, 1967, <br />1968; While, 1971; Beschel, 1973J. Its use has Jrimarily been <br />high-elevation or arctic climates, and the transf'~r value is lim- <br />ited, particularly for growth curves, Rhizocarpon geographicum, <br />the most commonly used lichen for dating, grows throughout <br />most of Colorado. Most lichenometric studies use a combina- <br />tion of maximum thallus diameter and percentage cover on <br />clast surfaces to determine the ages of late Holocene deposits <br />[Benedicl. 1967, 1968; Beschel, 1973; Birkeland et al., 1979J. <br />Lichens, which grow on all but freshly exposed or deposited <br /> <br />~ <br />W <br />" <br />" <br />;. <br /> <br />! <br /> <br />4.3. Regional Analyses of Maximum Rainfall <br />and Flood Data <br /> <br />A iack of flood evidence, particularly of extremely rare <br />floods, in one basin such as Elkhead Creek basin could result <br />from pure chance. Thus it is essential to ascertain the flood <br />history for other basins in the region [NRC, 1988]. Regional <br />analysis extends hydrometeorologic records and provides a <br />tool to estimate discharge at ungaged sites [JalTett and Costa, <br />1988; NRC, 1988; Hosking and Wallis, 1998J. In addition, re- <br />gional analyses provide improved estimates of precipitation <br />and streamflow characteristics for gaged sites by decreasing <br />time-sampling errors for relatively independent samples. <br />Predicting the upper limits to the magnitudes of floods in a <br />specific tegion has been a long-standing challenge in flood <br />hydrology. Envelope curves encompassing maximum rainfall <br />[Linsley et al., 1982; Jarrell, 1987, 1990bJ and floods in a homo- <br />geneous hydrometeorologic region have long been used in <br />flood hydrology [Crippen and Bue, 1977; Costa, 1987a; Jarrett, <br />1987, 1990b; Enzel et al., 1993). Utilization of envelope curves <br />for a hydro meteorologic region can be evaluated by examining <br />maximum floods in nearby basins. A premise for envelope <br />curves is that not all basins in the region are expected to have <br />had the maximwn flood, but no basin has yet had a flood that <br />exceeds the envelope curve for the specific region. The primary <br />limiting factors for extreme floods are amount, intensity, du- <br />ration, and spatial distribution of rainfall, which includes oro- <br />graphic enhancement effects and basin slope [Cosra, 1987b; <br />Pitlick, 1994]. Incorporating paleoflood data for various basins <br />in the region provides an opportunity to add a new level of <br />confidence to envelope curves [NRC, 1988; Enzel et al., 1993J. <br /> <br />4.4. Rainfall Data <br /> <br />Extreme rainfall data for the last 100 years were compiled <br />from 181 official precipitation gages and numerous supple- <br />mental rainfall-bucket surveys in western Colorado [McKee <br />and Doesken, 1997J. Four, long-term precipitation stations in <br />the study area, at Steamboat Springs, Hayden, Lay, and <br />Meeker (Figure 1), have been operated from 61 to 94 years. <br />Rainfall-hucket survey data, primarily collected by the Na- <br />tional Weather Service, Army Corps of Engineers, and Bureau <br />of Reclamation, were compiled for Colorado [Jarrett, 1987, <br />199Gb] and updated through 1997 for this study. Although very <br /> <br />-~ <br />