My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD09620
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
FLOOD09620
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:09:54 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:29:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Moffat
Basin
Yampa/White
Title
Regional Interdisciplinary Paleoflood Approach to Assess Extreme Flood Potential
Date
10/1/2000
Prepared For
Moffat County
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2978 <br /> <br />JARREIT AND TOMLINSON: REGIONAL INTERDISCIPLINARY PALEOFLOOD METIlOD <br /> <br />. Max paleofloods <br />KIrcher at at. Reservoir <br />envelope curve for I (at dam) Gage \.. ... <br />...__.~Ik.~,:"d_C'~.~:~~~.9!..._____uu.____u.___u~~'~\.m_m__~",~..-\r:::_u <br />c,-::::'~-==:::::::::: 7 <br /> <br />EMA (1=1=5,000 yr.; <br />ave. skew-o.03) <br /> <br />10000 <br /> <br />PMF <br /> <br />1000 <br /> <br />-!! <br />~ <br /> <br />E <br /> <br />.,; <br />e' <br />. <br />~ <br />u <br />. <br />'C <br />~ <br />. <br />. <br />.. <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br />.....~... <br /> <br />"" <br />I <br />10 <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />1 0 <br /> <br />100 <br />Recurrence Interval, years <br /> <br />1 000 <br /> <br />10000 <br /> <br />x Peak oracharge <br />95% confidence limits <br /> <br />EMA (P:S,OOO yr.; <br />station skew) <br /> <br />Figure 11. Flood-frequency relations for Eikhead Creek at Elkhead Reservoir [Kircher el al., 1985] with <br />paleoflood data (shown as a reclangle) at the reservoir; near Elkhead gage (0924500) with paleoflood data <br />(shown as a rectangle) using at-site and average skew with 95% confidence limits. P denotes the paleoflood <br />length of record. The envelope curve '/aiue (Figure 9) for maximum flooding in the Holocene is also shown. <br />The flood-frequency relation and probable maximum flood for Elkhead Reservoir (Ayres Associates, 1nc., <br />Fort Collins, Colorado, unpublished data, 1996) are shown for comparison. <br /> <br />[1985] that can be used to estimate these relations at an un- <br />gaged site such as Elkhead Reservoir. Kirche- el oi. [1985] <br />developed regression relations for 33 flow characteristics, <br />which include mean annual and mean monthly discharges, <br />flow-duration series, peak discharge, and minimum and maxi- <br />mum 7-day discharges for recurrence intervals from 2 to 500 <br />years. These relations were developed for four hydrologically <br />distinct regions in western Colorado using records from 264 <br />streamflow-gaging stations by relating gage flow characteristics <br />with basin physiographic and climatic explana:ory variables. <br />The regression relations developed from 67 gages in north- <br />western Colorado [Kircher ef ai., 1985, Table 81, which are a <br />function of drainage area and mean annual prec'~pitation, were <br />used to estimate flood-frequency relation for Elkhead Creek at <br />Elkhead Reservoir. The regional regression relations for <br />northwestern Colorado have a mean standard enor estimate of <br />63% [Kircher el al., 1985]. <br />At Elkhead Reservoir the drainage area is 531 km2, and the <br />mean annual precipitation for the basin is 635 mm. The f1ood- <br />frequency relation for Elkhead Creek at Elkhl~ad Reservoir <br />(Figure 11 and Table 3) was estimated using the work of <br />Kircher el ai. [1985]. The frequency curve in Figure 11 was <br />extended linearly. The 100-year flood estimate for Elkhead <br />Creek is about 61 m3 S-l at Elkhead Reservoir [Kircher et al., <br />1985] and compares with 64 m' s" at the gage using EMA <br />(Table 3). The estimated recunence interval for the maximum <br />paleoflood (135 m' S") at Elkhead Reservoir is slightly more <br />than 10,000 years (Figure 11) [Kircher ef al., 1985), and the <br />10,000-year flood is about 110 m' S'I (Table 3). The 10,000- <br />year flood estimate is 104 m' s" at the Elkhead gage (Table <br />3). The flood-frequency relation for the Elkhead Creek gage <br /> <br />(Figure 11 and Table 3), which has about 30% of the draioage <br />area at the reservoir, is similar to the regional relation. The <br />similarity of the relations are likely because the majority of the <br />basin bet\Veen the gage and the reservoir contributes little <br />additional peak runoff from snowmelt and rainfall. <br />Also shown on Figure 11 is the regional envelope value of <br />maximum flooding for Elkhead Reservoir from Figure 9. For <br />comparative purposes the PMF estimate shown for Elkhead <br />Creek at the dam (Ayres Associates Inc., written communica- <br />tion, 1996) is 1020 m' S-1, which is 4 times larger than the <br />envelope curve discharge value for Elkhead Reservoir, and the <br />recurrence interval for a flood the magnitude of the PMF <br />exceeds 10,000 years (Figure 11). The maximum paleoflood in <br />the last 5000 years for Elkhead Creek near Elkhead Reservoir <br />is about 13% of the site-specific PMF estimate. <br /> <br />6. Discussion <br /> <br />Paleoflood techniques and rainfall-runoff modeling (includ- <br />ing PMP/PMF methods) have inherent assumptions and limi- <br />tations that produce uncertain flood estimates. Although pa- <br />leoflood estimates also involve uncertainties, the estimates are <br />based on interpretations of physical data preserved in channels <br />and on floodplains during the past 5000 to 10,000 years in <br />northwestern Colorado. Paleoflood uncertainties primarily are <br />related to possible postflood changes in channel geometry and <br />flood heights interpreted from PSIs. Where possible, paleo- <br />flood estimates are obtained in bedrock-controlled channels <br />that minimize changes in channel geometry; there is little ev- <br />idence that major changes in channel geometry have occurred <br />in alluvial channels in the study area. Because beds of most <br /> <br /> <br />..., <br />, <br /> <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />i <br />t <br />< <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />i. <br />J <br />i <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />f <br /> <br />! <br />'. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.