Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />II <br />I <br /> <br />Oc-(-tJA,f <br />v station skewness. J.F. Sato & Associates made a study of th~ Winter Park <br />~ ,eflood in 1984. In that study they found that use of l7B instead of l7A pro- <br />t?>1'.1Io.ift4l <br />cedure reduced thevpeak flows by 7 percent. In the case of the 100-year <br />flooding of Fraser River at Granby, the difference is nearly a 15 percent <br />reduction. <br /> <br />, IV-3 <br />, ' I" I.J <br />-,,,,.', '. J, I L <br /> <br />The fourth method used was the multiple regression analysis. This method <br />correlates actual annual peak flood data of the tributary basins to the <br />Granby station. The 100-year flood at Granby is then able to be calculated <br />based on the multiple regression formula using the "known" 100-year flood at <br />the tributaries. Not all of the tributary drainage sub-basins have recorded <br />flood data. The five drainage sub-basins that have been used for this mul- <br />tiple regression analysis were studied by Worrall Engineering in 1983, and <br />Sato & Associates in 1984. They include the Fraser River near Winter Park, <br />Vasquez Creek at Winter Park, St. Louis Creek near Fraser, Ranch Creek near <br />Fraser and Meadow Creek near Tabernash (Fi9ure IV-2). <br /> <br />~mmation of these sub-drainage areas gives a total area of 115 square miles <br />which accounts for about 40 percent of the total Fraser drainage basin at ,'.' <br />/z,.t. tk- ,:}/"u.J;',. <br />Granby. Most of these sub-drainage basins have longer flood records~ Thus, 1 <br />this technique in effect extended the data base of the Granby station. The <br />use of the previously determined 100-year floods at tributaries as data <br />input also guarantees the consistency in the level of 100-year flood protec- <br />tion within the same drainage basin. <br /> <br />,'i' <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />Detailed information of the gaged sub-basins regarding its drainage area <br />size, mean basin elevation, year of records, etc. are listed in Table IV-I. <br />In this table the gage station number is related to the number shown on <br />Figure IV-2. <br /> <br />Tabulated in Table IV-2 are the annual flood peaks used in the regression <br />analysis. The derived regression equation takes the form of <br /> <br />Qg = 26.562 + 1.793 x Ow + 1.096 x Qs + 1.875 x Ou - 0.308 x Or + 1.065 x Om <br />t <br />V /i~ U <br />