Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />new conditions <br />~ new methodologies <br />comparison provided <br />compatible with previous flows <br />../ significantly different statistically <br />confidence limits <br />90% confidence interval <br />50% confidence interval <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />Diversion Characters: <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />Previous Studies: <br /> <br />does affect hydrology <br />does not affect hydrology <br />should not use stream data <br />from to <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />record s <br /> <br />existing <br />title <br />title <br />ti tie <br /> <br />informati.Pn <br />pl--:? <br /> <br />FINDING: <br /> <br />The hydrologic a~alysis -==- meets _____ does not meet the mlnlmum <br />standards of ~ Rule 5.B. (detailed) or Rule 6.B, (approx.) <br /> <br />C. Hydraulic Analysis <br /> <br /></ lD-year <br />v' 50-year <br />_~ lOD-year <br />.,/ 500-year (optional) <br />frequency-elevation table <br /> <br />1. Water Surface <br />Profiles included: <br /> <br />2. Floodplain ./ <br /> Boundaries: 0/' <br />3. Methodology: a. ~. <br /> v' <br /> b, <br /> <br />4. De lineation <br />Procedures: <br /> <br />,/ <br /> <br />-8-, <br /> <br />100-year <br />500-year (optional) <br /> <br />step backwater method <br />HEC-2 <br />other <br />alternative method <br />published manual <br />assumed depth method <br />depth stated on maps <br />geomorphic features method <br />history flood method <br />rating curve method <br /> <br />flood contour method etc. <br />map contour method etc. <br />