Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-""'" <br />'"""-2.: <br />- <br /> <br />-----...-- <br /> <br />MARK Gl.IDDEN, P.t: <br />- --~ -- <br /> <br />of improvements. Project was located in Mohave County, Arizollai, in an extremt:ly arid area subject <br />to high intensity, short duration runoff events. The project also includes the development of a <br />drainage design and administration manual and drafting of drainage ordinance. <br /> <br />City of Long Beach Watershed Planning, LOlllg Beach, California, Served as project engineer for <br />the development of hydrologic and hydraulic analyses and the evaluation of flood problems within <br />the city of Long Beach. Project included the development of a hydrologic model link between the <br />city's GIS and HEC-l. Hydraulic model was based upon a link between database and simplifit:d <br />hydraulic computation models. Results of the analysis were used to identity syst'~m deficiencies and <br />to develop a capital improvements program to address long-term concerns. <br /> <br />Westerly Creek Outfall Systems Planning Study, Aurora, Colorado. Project manager for the <br />development of an outfall systems plan for Westerly Creek through the city of Aurora. The project <br />involved the development of a hydrologic model DJ,r the watershed for both the existing level of <br />development and future development, Using the hydrology, the problem areas were identified and <br />the extent of the problems determined. Alternative solutions were developed in combination with the <br />project sponsors. A combination of detention basin improvements and storm sewer system <br />improvements and construction was the preferred alternative. Pre,liminary designs of the identified <br />facilities are included in the final outfall systems plan. <br /> <br />The project also included extensive evaluation of an unusual urban wetland/woodland area. This <br />area, known as the Jewell Wetland, was the focus of intense public interest. To address the concerns <br />of the local citizenry, several alternatives for the embankment and channel were evaluated. Th,~ <br />preferred alternative, which was included in the final asp, included the construction of a low <br />embankment, channel improvements with grade control structures, and a diversion to direct wat'~r <br />into the wetland areas under predetermined conditions. Extensive public involvement was conducted <br />during this phase. Two neighborhood workshops were conducted to solicit input: one of these <br />meetings was attended by more than 100 citizens. <br /> <br />Villages of Parker Golf Course, The Villages of Puker Development. Quality control supervisor <br />for the drainage and erosion control evaluation. Drainage evaluation was conducted using locally <br />accepted methodologies, however, the input was developed using GIS techniques. The quality <br />assurance effort for this project required a review of results as well as a verification of the <br />application of the GIS technology. Construction site erosion control measures w'~re also required to <br />protect the major drainageway flowing through tht: site. Provided direction arid oversight to the <br />design team. Assistance included the determination of appropriate methodologies, the verification of <br />the results, the identification of appropriate control measures, and the review of fmal drawings and <br />specifications. <br /> <br />PROFESSIONAL ENDEA VORS <br /> <br />HDR Engineering, Inc. <br />I 997-Present <br /> <br />Merrick & Company <br />1993-1997, 1977-1984 <br /> <br />Boyle Engineering Corporation <br />1986-1993 <br /> <br />1999 Flood Documentation Report <br />HDR Engineering, Inc. <br /> <br />~~\ <br />Ifli r:;:( '1~, <br />1..1.....(.,",'7';'. <br />\:;~"'~(;/ <br />"-~H.llj/ <br />