Laserfiche WebLink
<br />For the lower reach below the Timnath Reservoir Inlet ditch diversion, a hydraulic model <br />was developed for the 10-,50-, and I()()..year floods and a separate model was developed <br />for the 5oo-year flood. <br /> <br />A model was developed to provide a loo-year water-surface profile for the Cache La <br />Poudre Lowflow channel between Sections 201202 and 205242 of the main channel. <br />When the river rises above a certain level, the majority of the flow breaks out to the east <br />and then travels through a low-gravel pit, bypassing the Lowflow channel. The Lowflow <br />channel HEC-2 model was created for the reach between Cross Sections 201202 and <br />204025 of the main channel. The gravel pit east of the river was blocked using <br />encroachments. The HEC-2 split-flow option calculated the discharge that breaks out of <br />the Lowflow channel to the east. <br /> <br />The split-flow compUlations showed that most of the 100-year discharge bypasses the <br />Lowflow channel, leaving approximately 10 percent of the 1oo-year discharge within the <br />Lowflow channel. The discharge used to compute the 1oo-year water-surface elevations <br />along the gravel pit was not reduced by the lO-percent flow conveyed in the Lowflow <br />channel. A separate proftle was developed for the Cache La Poudre Lowflow channel. <br /> <br />The BNRR embankment divides the floodplain downstream of the City of Fort Collins' <br />Wastewater Treaunent Plant No.2. For the 10-,50-, and loo-year floods, only the area <br />of the right bank north of the railroad embankment was considered effective for flow. <br />To develop water-surface elevations south of the railroad, a model was developed to <br />consider the results of railroad-embankment failure. For the 5oo-year flood, the split- <br />flow option was used to calculate the flows that overtop the railroad embankment. The <br />lOO-year water-surface elevations south and north of the railroad embankment are shown <br />on the same profile panels. <br /> <br />There are two major flow diversions in the lower reach of the Cache La Poudre River. <br />Between Cross Sections AE and AF (Sections 211017 and 212317 in the HEC-2 model) <br />on the main channel, flow spills to the left bank gravel-pit area and flows along a separate <br />flow path (referenced as Cache La Poudre LP A TH) before rejoining the main flow path <br />just below the Fossil Creek Ditch diversion. The amount of flow diverted to LP A TH was <br />computed using the split-flow routine from the 1989 study. <br /> <br />The other major flow diversion in the lower reach is a divided flow through gravel pits <br />on the right bank from just below the Timnath Reservoir Canal diversion to just upstream <br />of Prospect Road (referenced as Cache La Poudre RPATH). The division of flow <br />between the main channel and RP A TH was determined by balancing the computed energy <br />loss between the models for the 100- and 500-year floods in the lower reach below the <br />Timnath Reservoir Inlet ditch diversion and the model for RPATH. <br /> <br />In the reach above the Timnath Reservoir Ditch diversion, the main flow of the Cache <br />La Poudre River was modeled using two separate HEC-2 models. One model was for <br />the 10-, 50-, and lOO-year floods and the other was for the 500-year flood. In addition, <br />there are several divided flows. Between Mulberry Street and Lincoln Avenue, the 5()()" <br />year flood overtops Lemay Avenue on the left bank. This flows enters the drainage basin <br />for Dry Creek and returns to the Cache La Poudre River below the Timnath Reservoir <br />Ditch diversion. <br /> <br />14 <br />