Laserfiche WebLink
<br />for which a floodway was computed (Section 4.2), selected cross <br />section locations are also shown on the Flood Boundary and Floodway <br />Map (Exhibit 2). <br /> <br />Roughness coefficients (Manning's "nlO) used in the hydraulic <br />computations were determined by field observation. Roughness values <br />for the main channel of the Colorado River and Alkali Creek ranged <br />from 0.035 to 0.040, whereas overbank roughness values ranged from <br />0.060 to 0.070. The coefficients used for the main channel of the <br />Roaring Fork ranged from 0.035 to 0.045 and from 0.050 to 0.090 <br />for the overbank. The Crystal River had coefficients ranging from <br />0.040 to 0.035 for the main channel and 0.050 to 0.090 for the <br />overbank area. Roughness coefficients for the main channel and <br />overbank areas of Cattle Creek varied from 0.035 to 0.050, and <br />0.050 to 0.060, respectively. The coefficients used for Fourmile <br />Creek ranged from 0.060 to 0.070 for the main channel and 0.060 to <br />0.080 for the overbank areas. Threemile Creek had coefficients <br />ranging from 0.045 to 0.050, and 0.080 to 0.090 for the main channel <br />and overbank areas, respectively. Mitchell Creek used coefficients <br />ranging from 0.045 to 0.050 for the main channel and 0.040 to 0.045 <br />for the overbank areas. Roughness values for the main channel of <br />Rifle Creek ranged from 0.040 to 0.050, whereas overbank roughness <br />values ranged from 0.050 to 0.080. Roughness values for the main <br />channel of Government Creek ranged from 0.035 to 0.040, whereas <br />overbank roughness values ranged from 0.035 to 0.045. Roughness <br />values for the main channel of Hubbard Gulch ranged from 0.035 to <br />0.045, whereas overbank roughness values ranged from 0.035 to 0.050. <br /> <br />The starting water-surface elvations for the Colorado River, <br />Government and Alkali Creeks, and Hubbard Gulch were determined by <br />the slope-area method. The starting water-surface elevation for <br />the Roaring Fork River was derived from a previous flood study <br />done by Gingery Associates, Inc. (Reference 12). For the Crystal <br />River, the starting water-surface elevation was based on the flood <br />elevation on the Roaring Fork at the confluence. Cattle Creek, <br />Mitchell Creek, and Threemile Creek derived their starting water- <br />surface elevations from critical depth. Rifle and Fourmile Creeks <br />starting water-surface elevation was taken as the normal depth for <br />the given discharge. <br /> <br />Rifle Creek overflows its western bank just upstream of County <br />Highway 291. This overflow is referred to in this Flood Insurance <br />Study as Rifle Creek Splitflow. A separate HEC-2 step-backwater <br />analysis (Reference 6) was performed for the splitflow. Discharge <br />values used in the step-backwater analysis were based on a hydraulic <br />analysis of the overflow from the main channel of Rifle Creek. <br />Cross sections were digitized from aerial photographs (Reference 9). <br />Roughness factors for the channel ranged from 0.050 to 0.080, <br />whereas 0.080 was used for the overbank. The starting water-surface <br />elevations were based upon the computed water-surface elevations <br />On Rifle Creek. A profile base line was used to establish the <br /> <br />] 2 <br />