Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />SECTIONTHREE AUected Environments and Environmental Consequences <br /> <br />during the 1997 flood, this alternative would have prevented floodwaters from entering Sterling <br />and flood elevations would have been reduced by 4 to 6 feet upstream of the Highway 6 and <br />UPRR bridges, and by 3 to 6 feet upstreanl of the UPRR embankment at Atwood (URS Greiner <br />Woodward Clyde 1999). It is estimated that the alternative would have prevented over <br />$10 million in damage to residential, commercial, and infrastructure in Sterling; and reduced <br />flood damage to residential structures, agriculture land, and transportation infrastructure in <br />Logan County by approximately $1 million. In addition, Alternative 2 would have a small, <br />short-term beneficial effect on the local economy associated with the purchase of goods and <br />services during the construction of the project. <br /> <br />3.5.3 Alternative 3 . Pawnee Creek Overflow Cutoff <br /> <br />Other than the conversion of agricultural land to flood control facilities as discussed in <br />Section 3.2.3, impacts associated with this alternative are beneficial. Therefore, this alternative <br />would not have a disproportional adverse impact on any minority or low-income population. All <br />lands would be purchased on a "willing" seller basis as no land would be condemned with this <br />alternative. Flood protection would be provided only to Sterling. If this alternative had been in <br />place during the 1997 flood, it would have prevented over $10 million in damages to residential, <br />commercial, and infrastructure properties in Sterling. In addition, Alternative 3 would have a <br />small, short-term beneficial effect on the local economy associated with the purchase of goods <br />and services during the construction of the project. <br /> <br />3.6 AIR QUALITY <br /> <br />The National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) established by the U.S. Environmental <br />Protection Agency define the allowable concentrations of pollutants that may be reached but not <br />exceeded in a given time period to protect human health (primary standard) and welfare <br />(secondary standard) with a reasonable margin of safety. The standards include maximum <br />concentrations for ozone, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, lead, and <br />particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns. Logan County is classified as a NAAQS <br />Attainment Area (C. Dann, Public Information Officer, Colorado Department of Public Health <br />and the Environment, Air Quality Division, personal communication 1999), which indicates <br />existing concentrations of air pollutants are below the established standard(s), and limited <br />emissions are allowable. <br /> <br />3.6.1 Alternative 1 . No Action <br /> <br />The No Action Alternative would not impact air quality in the project vicinity or surrounding <br />areas because no construction would occur. <br /> <br />3-9 <br />