Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ii I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br /> <br />SECTIONTWO <br /> <br />Alternatives Considered <br /> <br />Photographs of the Highway 6 and UPRR bridges and Pawnee Creek upstream and downstream <br />of the bridges are shown in Exhibits 5 and 6. <br /> <br />Riverside Cemetery Area Improvements <br /> <br />Culverts, dikes, floodwalls, flood channel and drop structure would be sized to handle 5,000 cfs <br />of floodwater (projected 1 DO-year flood event) and would include the follO\\ing project features: <br /> <br />· Construction of a I ,500-foot-long by 50-foot-wide by 5-foot-high berm to the north and east <br />of the Riverside Cemetery <br /> <br />· Lowering a 300-foot section and raising an 800-foot section ofCR 24 <br /> <br />· Construction of a 500-foot-long by 75-foot-wide channel with a concrete floodwall north of <br />the cemetery; the floodwall would be sized to allow 3 feet of freeboard, which means the top <br />of the floodwall would be 3 feet higher than the elevation of the I DO-year flood event. <br /> <br />· Building and installation of a closure structure for Highway 6 that is sized to accommodate <br />3 feet of freeboard. The closure structure would include manholes that, when opened, would <br />allow the installation of vertical I-beams which would serve as tracks for the placement of <br />wooden planks ("stop logs") to contain and transport the floodwater across Highway 6. This <br />structure includes a stop log structure upstream and dO\\TIstream of the actual crossing point. <br />The temporary closure structure would be erected only when flooding in the vicinity of <br />Riverside Cemetery was predicted. <br /> <br />· Construction of eleven 20-foot by 4-foot box culverts under the UPRR embankment <br /> <br />· Installation of a siphon under the new flood channel for the Sterling No. I Ditch <br /> <br />· Construction of a 7,000-foot-Iong by 250-foot-wide flood channel from the UPRR <br />embankment to the South Platte River <br /> <br />· Modification of two private drives and one minor county road by creating gradual depression <br />in road grade within the constructed channel, hardening the road surface within the <br />constructed channel, and installation of a low-flow culvert within each road grade to convey <br />low flows across the county road and two driveways <br /> <br />· Construction of a riprap-protected drop structure where the constructed flood flow channel <br />discharges to the South Platte River <br /> <br />Photographs of location of the flood channel and the UPRR embankment at the Riverside <br />Cemetery location are provided in Exhibits 7 and 8. Design features of the drop structure would <br />be the same as discussed for Alternative 2. <br /> <br />Alternative 3 . Pawnee Creek Overflow Cutoff <br /> <br />This alternative was identified as Alternative 4 in the applicant's Flood Hazard Mitigation <br />Feasibility Study (ICON 1998). This alternative has the same features as the Riverside Cemetery <br /> <br />2-4 <br />