My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD09522
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
FLOOD09522
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2023 4:58:17 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:26:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Logan
Community
Sterling, Atwood
Basin
South Platte
Title
Pawnee Creek Flood Mitigation, City of Sterling, Town of Atwood and Logan County
Date
7/1/1999
Prepared For
Logan County
Prepared By
URS Greiner Woodward Clyde
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Mitigation/Flood Warning/Watershed Restoration
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />'I <br />I <br />1\ <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />;1 <br />I <br />! I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />t <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br /> <br />SECTIONTWO <br /> <br />Alternatives Considered <br /> <br />floodwaters. This alternative was eliminated from consideration due to the continued potential <br />for flooding in the lower portion of the basin. <br /> <br />2.1.3 Construction of Drainage Floodway Upstream of Atwood <br /> <br />The alternative, identified as Alternative 6 in the applicant's Flood Hazard Mitigation Feasibility <br />Study, would provide a floodway upstreanl (southwest) of Atwood that would divert Pawnee - <br />Creek to the south along CR 29, directly to the South Platte River. The floodway would be sized <br />to accommodate the peak flows associated with the 100-year flood event. The constructed <br />floodway would intercept the Pawnee Irrigation Ditch, Highway 6, and the UPRR tracks. The <br />alternative was eliminated due to the large amount of agricultural lands that would be impacted <br />and the cost of moving large quantities of fill material. In addition, this alternative was perceived <br />to have more unknowns that could potentially increase costs (ICON 1998). <br /> <br />2.2 ALTERNATIVES CARRIED FORWARD <br /> <br />The potential environmental impacts for three alternatives are evaluated in this report. These <br />alternatives include: <br /> <br />.. No Action <br /> <br />. Improve Routing of Pawnee Creek Flood Flows <br />. Pawnee Creek Overflow Cutoff <br /> <br />2.2.1 Alternative 1 . No Action <br /> <br />With the No Action Alternative, no improvements would be made to or other work performed <br />along Pawnee Creek. Without improvements, flooding and resultant damages would continue to <br />occur as they have historically. <br /> <br />2.2.2 Alternative 2 . Improve Routing of Pawnee Creek Flood Flows (Proposed <br />Action) <br /> <br />This alternative is identified as Alternative 5 in the applicant's Flood Hazard Mitigation <br />Feasibility Study QCON 1998). This alternative includes flood flow routing activities near <br />Atwood, near the Highway 6 and UPRR bridges over Pawnee Creek, and near Riverside <br />Cemetery. Exhibit 2 shows the general location of the project activities. Specific features at <br />each location are shown in Exhibit 3 and are described below. <br /> <br />Atwood Improvements <br /> <br />Culverts and flood channels would be sized to handle 5,000 cfs of floodwater, which represents <br />approximately 20 percent of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' predicted 100-year flood event <br />of24,500 cfs (URS Greiner Woodward Clyde 1999). Project components at this location <br />include: <br /> <br />2-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.