My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD09514
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
FLOOD09514
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:09:29 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:25:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Grand
Community
Ouray Ranch
Stream Name
Colorado River
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Title
Ouray Ranch Project Phase II Preliminary Plat
Date
12/13/1984
Prepared For
Grand County
Prepared By
RME
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />.1 <br />I <br />I <br />!I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />B-6 <br /> <br /> <br />Case 2 - <br /> <br />100yr rainfall (24hr) occurring after a snow- <br />melt peak and with the reservoir full at ele- <br />vation 8279.7. We selected the base snow <br />melt flows under this situation to be 75% of <br />the 100yr peak snow melt inflow. The reser- <br />voir level is set at 79.7 since this seems to <br />represent the normal operating mode after the <br />reservoir is filled. <br /> <br />Case 3 - <br /> <br />25yr snow melt peak and 25yr rainfall peak <br />entering the reservoir simultaneously at a <br />level of 79.5. Theoretically this has a <br />probability of 1 in 625, excluding considera- <br />tion of the need for a full reservoir. <br /> <br />E. <br /> <br />SUMMARY OF RESULTS <br /> <br />The reservoir routing calculation summaries are pre- <br />sented on the attached Figures 1, 2, and 3. Each peak <br />reservoir discharge was reduced by 300cfs to reflect ir- <br />rigation diversions upstream of Phase 2; 1983 & 1984 <br />records indicate a range of 200-400cfs for this effect. <br />The discharge ranges are shown to depict the impact of <br />variance in the operator's selection of reservoir re- <br />leases. As listed above, a summary of the results is as <br />follows: <br /> <br /> PEAK PEAK PEAK PEAK <br /> SNOW MELT RAINFALL DI5- FLOW AT <br /> INFLOW INFLOW CHARGE YMCA SITE <br />Case 1 - 100yr Snow melt <br /> 4500cfs -0- 3800-4000cfs 3500-3700cfs <br />Case 2 - 100yr Rainfall <br /> 3200cfs 6480cfs 4800-5000cfs 4500-4700cfs <br />Case 3 - 25yr Snow melt/25yr Rainfall <br /> 3600cfs 5l00cfs 5000-5200cfs 4700-4900cfs <br /> <br />The 25yr Snow melt/25yr Rainfall simultaneous occur- <br />rence seems to be unnecessarily restrictive. As stated <br />above, the theoretical probability of this occurrence is <br />1 in 625, not counting the need for a full reservoir at <br />the time. The theoretical probability of simultaneous <br />occurrence of 10yr events would be 1 in 100; based on <br />the above work we would estimate the reservoir discharge <br />to be on the order of 4400cfs. <br /> <br />The probability of a looyr rainfall occurring around <br />July 1, with a full reservoir and continuing snow melt <br />flows of the 3200cfs range is a reasonable condition and <br />provided the second highest estimated discharges. <br /> <br />We therefore recommend a 100yr event flow of 4600cfs <br />at the Phase 2 site, based on Case 2 conditions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.