Laserfiche WebLink
<br />pond upstream. The city used the COE HEC-1 rainfall-runoff <br />computer program (Reference 13) to compute the 100-year discharge. <br />The same model was used in this Flood Insurance Study with <br />appropriate precipitation values for the 10-, 50-, and SOO-year <br />storms. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The HEC-l computer program utilizes as input the following data: <br />rainfall, loss rates, unit hydrographs, base flow, and routing <br />criteria. Rainfall computations for the 10- and 50-year storms <br />were based on precipitation-frequency data and areal reduction <br />factors derived from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric <br />Administration Atlas. To obtain the precipitation value for the <br />SOO-year flood, a frequency-precipitation curve for the stream was <br />plotted using the 10-, 50-, and 100-year value, and the curve was <br />extrapolated to a SOO-year value. Unit hydrographs were derived by <br />the Snyder Method and loss rates were established by hydrologists <br />familiar with the area. A base flow of 60 cfs was used. <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />Results of hydrologic analysis for Big Salt Wash and Little Salt <br />Wash presented in the 1976 COE Flood Hazard Information Reports <br />(Reference 15) were used in this study. <br /> <br />Plateau, Grove, Buzzard and Roan Creeks, among tributaries to the <br />Colorado River from the vicinity of DeBeque to Glenwood Springs, <br />Colorado, are streams that flood from snowmelt as well as from <br />summer rain. Peak di scharges for 10-, 50-, 100-, and SOO-year <br />floods were determined using a regional floodflow frequency <br />analysis (Reference 16) based on rainfall and snowmelt data. The <br />results of the snowmelt and rainfall frequency analysis were <br />combined statistically to give a maximum flow for both events. <br />Regional curves of drainage area versus discharge were computed for <br />the four frequency floods for Roan Creek. Streamflow data of <br />rainfall flood events were insufficient to accomplish this, <br />therefore the SCS TR-20 computer program was used to simulate <br />rainfall flood peaks. The model was used on 16 watersheds of <br />varying sizes. A regional curve of drainage area versus peak <br />discharge and frequency was developed for rainfall flooding. The <br />TR-20 analysis included the standard SCS Type II (24-hour) rainfall <br />distribution and curve numbers for an average antecedent soil <br />moisture condition (AMC-II). The discharge-versus-drainage-area <br />data from this analysis were plotted, and a regression line <br />computed for several frequencies. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />A regional curve was developed for snowmelt flood events using <br />streamgage data from 8 streamgages in the area. The log-Pearson <br />Type III frequency distribution as defined in WRC Bulletin l7-B <br />(Reference 12) was used with a regional skew weighted wi th each <br />computed station skew. The data were plotted and frequency 1 ines <br />were drawn. <br /> <br />The two regional discharge frequency-drainage area curves (rainfall <br />and snowmelt) were combined using a standard probability equation: <br /> <br />P(comb)=P(snow)+P(rain)-(P(snow)xP(rain)) <br /> <br />21 <br />