Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The Pacific Southwest Interagency Committee (PSIAC, ref. 11) has deve- <br /> <br /> <br />loped a method of rating sediment yield from a watershed for use as an aid for <br /> <br /> <br />broad planning purposes. The method consists of numerically rating nine fac- <br /> <br /> <br />tors which influence sediment production in the watershed, and then summing <br /> <br /> <br />the nine ratings. This final rating corresponds to a range of sediment yields <br /> <br /> <br />(Sy) in acre-feet per square mile, Table 20. The ranges of estimated Sy <br /> <br /> <br />values indicate that precision was not the intended result of the PSIAC <br /> <br />method. <br /> <br />Table 20. sediment Yield Classification (ref. 11) <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The PSIAC method has been tested against actual Sy values measured in <br /> <br /> <br />ponds and dams in the southwest. The comparisons were done on watersheds of <br /> <br /> <br />less than about 20 square miles, and PSIAC results agreed with or were <br /> <br /> <br />slightly lower than actual measurements. <br /> <br /> <br />Estimation of Sy based on the PSIAC method is used as a guideline to <br /> <br /> <br />annual yields. However, due to the erratic nature of precipitation and <br /> <br /> <br />floodwater flow in the study area, a more useful approach is to predict Sy <br /> <br /> <br />on an event basis. More accurate prediction of Sy is possible only by <br /> <br /> <br />detailed analysis using physical process models of runoff and sediment produc- <br /> <br /> <br />tion on an event basis. Predicted values of long- and short-term sediment <br /> <br /> <br />production are dicussed in a subsequent section. <br /> <br /> <br />The nine factors that are rated are; surficial geology, soil, climate, <br /> <br /> <br />runoff, topography, ground cover, land use, upland erosion, and channel ero- <br /> <br /> <br />sion and sediment transport. These factors were rated for the Fossil Creek <br /> <br /> <br />watershed based on data from aerial photography, soil surveys and maps, as <br /> <br />well as site visits. The following paragraphs present a brief discussion of <br /> <br /> <br />each of these factors in the Fossil Creek watershed. <br /> <br /> Annual <br /> Sediment Yield <br /> Rating Classification ac-ft/mi2 <br /> > 100 1 > 3.0 <br />75 to 100 2 1.0 to 3.0 <br />50 to 75 3 0.5 to 1.0 <br />2S to 50 4 0.2 to 0.5 <br />0 to 25 5 < 0.2 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />5.2.1 Geology <br /> <br />In most areas of the Fossil Creek watershed, geologic formations are <br /> <br /> <br />covered with alluvium, colluvium, or residual materials. Bedrock consists of <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />sandstone which outcrops along a reach of Lang Gulch. Also, in the upland <br /> <br /> <br />hills of the watershed, rocks and rock exposures are common. There is no <br /> <br /> <br />active faulting in the area. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />40 <br />