My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD09481
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
FLOOD09481
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:09:22 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:22:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State
Stream Name
All
Basin
Statewide
Title
Practices in Detention of Urban Stormwater Runoff
Date
1/1/1974
Prepared For
American Public Works Association
Prepared By
American Public Works Association
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />torrential rainfall in urban and suburban areas <br />of northeastern lllinois in August, 1972, The <br />areas hardest hit were communities located <br />west of the City of Chicago in Cook, DuPage <br />and Will Counties. The storm started Friday, <br />August 25th at about 5 p.m. and lasted until <br />I a,m. Saturday morning. Total rainfall was <br />6.88 inches (unofficially) in one locality and <br />2.49 inches (officially) several miles away. <br />Over $23 million in damages were reported in <br />preliminary estimates. Electricity was cut off <br />from 40,000 customers and phone service to <br />45,000 homes was interrupted for days by <br />problems resulting from the flooding. Many <br />homes were flooded with up to II feet of <br />water. Some individual well water supplies <br />were polluted, although public water supplies <br />were tested and found to have no <br />contamination. <br />In a r100ding incident such as this, on-site <br />detention facilities would have been of vast <br />help by delaying the entry of stormwater into <br />the sewer systems and rivers, The stormwater <br />could have been released from storage <br />facilities over a long period of time to reduce, <br />if not eliminate, much of the flooding that <br />resulted from sewer surcharging and high <br />stages in rivers, creeks and ditches. It would <br />not have been possible to detain all of the <br />excess runoff from all affected areas, but an <br />area-wide system of detention facilities may <br />have reduced peak runoff discharges to levels <br />that the receiving streams and sewer systems <br />might have been capable of handling. <br />Pollution: Pollution of stormwater <br />runoff comes largely from four major sources: <br />I. contact with municipal and industrial <br />wastes in combined sewers; <br />2. litter, debris and chemicals on parking <br />lots, streets and alleys; <br />3. silt resulting from soil erosion; and <br />4. pesticides and fertilizers washed off <br />vegetation. <br />The pollution from combined sewers is <br />obvious. The high flow rates in such sewers <br />during storm periods carries wastes deposited <br />in the sewers, during low flows, to the outfall. <br />Sanitary waste commingled with <br />stormwater is forced out of sewer inlets and <br />manholes, and is also discharged to receiving <br />waters during unavoidable overflows from <br /> <br />intercepting sewers. The problem of pollution <br />from combined sewer overflows has received <br />considerable attention by the Federal <br />Government as evidenced by its extensive <br />funding of research in this field. <br />The pollution aspects of urban runoff <br />from street debris are becoming more and <br />more obvious. In his paper, Treatment of <br />Urban Runoff I, FJ. Condon describes a <br />hpyothetical situation by comparing the <br />pollution from urban runoff with the pollution <br />from sanitary sewage and secondary <br />treatment plant effluent. He states that the <br />effects of this pollution, especially tlfe heavy <br />metals, is not adequately defined to <br />determine its seriousness, but that it is <br />obvious that storm water runoff is highly <br />polluted. Mr, Condon notes in his paper that <br />data on the pollution load of stormwater <br />runoff is often contradictory. In some studies, <br />for example, it was found that antecedent <br />rainfall or street cleaning more than 24 hours <br />prior to the rainfall had no effect on water <br />quality, Other investigators found that <br />antecedent events up to 10 days previous to <br />the rainfall had measurable effects on water <br />quality. Nevertheless, the possible need for <br />treatment of runoff to control pollution of <br />receiving streams from drainage of streets and <br />other urban areas is recognized. In the future, <br />discharge of untreated stormwater from <br />separate sewers into lakes or rivers may no <br />longer be acceptable. <br />Soil erosion is a third area of pollution of <br />stormwater. In developed areas, soil erosion <br />can be very minor; but land under <br />development can contribute large amounts of <br />sediment through erosion. Soil erosion is <br />estimated at over I billion tons of soil a year, <br />with land under construction contributing <br />from 50 to 40,000 times the erosion of <br />undeveloped or developed land. Erosion is <br />considered by some to be the largest single <br />source of stream pollution. The application of <br />on-site detention of storm water runoff to <br />control erosion and accompanying siltation is <br />covered in detail in Chapter 6. <br />Another significant source of storm water <br />pollution can be pesticides and fertilizers <br />washed off vegetation. <br />Beneficial Use of Storm water: As many <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.