Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />38 <br /> <br />ROGER A. PIELKE. JR. <br /> <br />Vilkins. L.: 1996. 'Living with the Flood: Human and Governmental Responses to Real and Sym- <br />bolic Risk'. (Chapler 10), in Changoon. S. A. (ed.), The Great Flood of /993: Causes, Impacts. <br />and Responus, Weslview Press, Boulder, CO. <br />VMO (World Meteorological Organization): 1992, Il1fernational Glossary of Hydrology. UNESCO <br />and WMO. Geneva, Switzerland. <br />'1ood, R. A.: 1993, 'Flash FloodIFlood State-by-Slate Fatality Statistics 1945-93', in Storm Data <br />1993: A CompvsiU of Outstunding SWrm.\' 35 (13), NOAA, Washington, D.C.. pp. 80--81. <br />Nood. R. A.: 1994. 'Flash FloodIFlood Fatalities - 1960 through ]994 - United Stales, Puerto <br />Rico and the Virgin Islands. Year-by- YearIState-by-Stale'. in 5wrm DoUJ. and Unusual Weather <br />Phenomtrlo with Late Repom and Correct;on,f 36 (12), NOAA, Washington, D.C., pp. 56-58. <br />Nrighl, J.: 1996, 'Effects of the Flood on National Policy: Some Achievements, Major Challenges <br />Remain', (Chapter II), in Changnon, S. A. (ed.), The Great Flood of 1993: Cause.f, Impact.f, and <br />Response,f, Westview Press, Boulder, CO. <br />levin, S. F.: 1994. 'Steps Toward an Integrated Approach to Hydrometeorological Forecasting <br />Services', Bull. Amer. MeleoroI. 50c 75 (7), 1267-1276. <br /> <br />IMPACTS ON GLOBAL OZONE AND CLIMATE FROM USE AND <br />EMISSION OF 2,2-DlCHLORO-I,I,I-TRIFLUOROETHANE (HCFC.I23) <br /> <br />JAMES M, CALM', DONALD J, WUEBBLES' and ATUL K, JAIN' <br /> <br />I Engineering COn.fU/Wnl. 10887 Wood/euf Lune, Great Fulls, Vif,l~i/liu 22066.3003. USA. <br />E.mail: jmc:@~pec:trum.internet.com <br />2 Department of Atmo.fpheric Sciences. University of Illinois at Urbana. Champaign, <br />105 South Gregory Street, Urbana, Illinois 61801.4723, U.S.A. <br />E-mail: wuebb!es@almO.f.lliuc.edu and jain@uiatma.atmos.uiucedu <br /> <br />(Received 13 March 1998; in revised form 27 August 1998) <br /> <br />Abstract. Analyses of emissions, and consequent chlorine loading, show that projected use of 2,2- <br />dichloro.I.l,I-trifluoroethane (HCFC-I23) will result in a virtually indiscernible impact on strato- <br />spheric ozone. Parametric scenarios uphold this conclusion, even for extreme levels of emissions far <br />exceeding those of current technologies and practices. Additional scenarios reaffirm the conclusion <br />for continued use - beyond the scheduled phaseout date - as a refrigerant in closed systems. By <br />contrast, use of this compound offers unique opportunities to reduce global warming. Moreover, <br />time-dependent analyses show thaI the minimal contribution to stratospheric chlorine from HCFC. <br />123 emissions will not peak until more than a decade after the residual peaks of chlorine and bromine, <br />from prior chlorofluorocarbon and halon releases. subside. While no single index exists to compare <br />the relative demerits of ozone depletion and climate change, three conclusions arc clear. First, reversal <br />of the buildup of bromine and chlorine (Le., healing of the 'ozone layer') is underway and progressing <br />on target. while sufficient practical remedies for global climate change are far more difficult. Se(;Ond, <br />the analyses show that phaseout of all chlorinated, and conceptually - but much less probably - all <br />brominated, compounds of anthropogenic origin targets some compounds that provide environmental <br />benefits. Most chlorinated and brominated compounds do warrant phaseout; the exceptions are those <br />with very short atmospheric lifetimes, and consequent low ozone depletion potential (ODP), that <br />also offer offsetting environmental benefits. And third, since new global environmental concerns <br />may, and probably will, be identified in the future, a more scientific approach is needed to determine <br />environmental acceptability or rejection. <br /> <br />1. Introduction <br /> <br />Scientific assessments and regulatory actions usually group organohalides by their <br />molecular composition. These broad distinctions imply degrees of relative con- <br />cern with their potentials, upon emission, for depletion of stratospheric ozone. <br />The chlorinated and fluorinated species are most commonly divided inlO the chlo. <br />rofluorocarbon (CFC), hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC), and hydro fluorocarbon <br />(HFC) families (WMO, 1995; UNEP, ]993). These distinctions follow similarities <br />in industrial applications and comparalive magnitudes for ozone depletion potential <br />(ODP) when released. As shown in Table ], which addresses the chemicals used <br />and under consideration as refrigerants. the OOPs for these groups are of the order <br />of 1 for CFCs, 0.01-0.1 for HCFCs, and less than 0.001 - approximately zero- <br /> <br />.l" Climatic Change 42: 439-474, 1999. <br />.,~ @ 1999 Kluwf!f Academic Puhli.fhers. Printed in the Nether/UIl(/,\ <br />