Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd) <br /> <br />llo <br />ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS <br />CULTURAL IMPACTS <br />ECONOMIC IMPACTS <br />DIVISION OF IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITIES <br />COST APPORTIONMENT <br />FEDERAL RESPONSIBILITY <br />NON-FEDERAL RESPONSIBILITY <br />FEASIBILITY-PHASE REQUIREMENTS <br />FEASIBILITY. PHASE STUDY COST <br />PRELIMINARY FINANCIAL ANALYSIS <br />SUMKARY OF COORDINATION. PUBLIC VIEIlS. AND COMMENTS <br />CONCLUSIONS <br />RECOKllENDATIONS <br /> <br />lAP <br />30 <br />31 <br />31 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />35 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />37 <br />38 <br />40 <br /> <br /> LIST OF TABLES <br />t!2... Illa lAP <br />1 COMPARISON OF DISCHARGES BETWEEN <br /> MALTA FIS AND RECONNAISSANCE STUDY 14 <br />2 BUILDING AND CONTENT VAll1E IN SOO.YEAR FLOOD PLAIN 17 <br />3 NUKBER OF STRUCTURES AFFECTED FOR FLOOD EVENTS 17 <br />4 AVERAGE FLOOD DEPTHS AT BUILDINGS 18 <br />5 MILK RIVER EXISTING CONDITIONS ESTIMATED ACTUAL <br /> DAMAGE-FREQUENCY RELATIONSHIP 19 <br />6 FLOOD CONTROL BENEFITS VITH LEVEES 28 <br />7 BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS 29 <br />8 BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS 29 <br />9 DETAILED COST ESTIMATE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAN 32 <br />10 PRELIMINARY LEVEE BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS 33 <br />11 COST APPORTIONMENT 34 <br /> <br />11 <br />