Laserfiche WebLink
<br />60000 <br /> <br />Ql <br />.~ <br />... <br />ftI <br />~ <br />E <br />~ <br />u <br /> <br />no glge In operation <br /> <br /> <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />,... <br />N <br /> <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />'" <br />N <br /> <br />:! 50000 <br />u <br /> <br />Ql <br />~ 40000 <br />ftI <br />..s::. <br />u <br />.!!! <br />C <br /> <br />~ <br />en <br />o <br /> <br />~ <br />en <br />o <br /> <br />30000 <br /> <br />:> <br /> <br />20000 <br /> <br />o <br />o <br />I/) <br />'" <br />N <br /> <br />possible effects <br />from regulation <br />diversions <br /> <br />~ <br />en <br />o <br /> <br />10000 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />o <br />1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 <br /> <br />year <br /> <br />Figure 9. Mass curve for three streamflow-gaging stations (09126000, <br />09126500, and 09127000) on the Cimarron River at/near Cimarron, Colorado. <br />Note change in slope after gage moved upstream in 1954; slope decreased <br />from decrease in contributing area and runoff contribution. <br />