Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> <br />activities in the floodplain simply cannot be discarded as <br />inappropriate. Implementing this approach, the Review <br />Committee believes, will bring about changes necessary <br />to reduce flood vulnerability to both the infrequent <br /> <br />major flood events and the more frequent smaller ones. <br />Implementation also will reduce the environmental, <br />social, and economic burdens imposed by current <br />conditions on both public and private sectors. <br /> <br />SHARING THE CHALLENGE - FEDERAL, STATE, TRIBAL AND LOCAL <br />GOVERNMENTS, BUSINESSES, CITIZENS <br /> <br />Since passage of the Flood Control Act of 1936, the <br />federal government has dominated the nation's flood <br />damage reduction efforts and, as a result, the nation's <br />floodplain management activity. Structural programs <br />were deemed important and were also the principal <br />sources of funds for any efforts to stem the rising tide <br />of flood losses. In recent years, the federal government <br />has begun to support nonstructural approaches. Many <br />states, tribes, and local governments have developed <br />and carried out floodplain management efforts that both <br />reduced flood damages and enhanced the natural <br />functions of floodplains. In carrying out these <br />programs, however, they have been hampered by <br />uncoordinated and conflicting federal programs, <br />policies, regulations and guidelines that have hindered <br />efficient floodplain management. Some state and local <br />governments have not been as active in floodplain <br />management. With the federal government assuming <br />the dominant role and funding most ecosystem <br />restoration, flood damage reduction, and flood recovery <br />activities, the incentive has been limited for many state, <br />tribal and local governments, businesses, and private <br />citizens to share responsibility for making wise <br />decisions concerning floodplain activity. Now is the <br />time to: <br /> <br />. Share responsibility and accountability for <br />accomplishing floodplain management among <br />all levels of government and with all citizens of <br />the nation. The federal government cannot go it <br />alone nor should it take a dominant role in the <br />process. <br /> <br />. Establish, as goals for the future, the <br />reduction of the vulnerability of the nation to <br />the dangers and damages that result from <br />floods and the concurrent and integrated <br />preservation and enhancement of the natural <br />resources and functions of floodplains. Such <br />an approach seeks to avoid unwise use of the <br />floodplain, to minimize vulnerability when <br />floodplains must be used, and to mitigate <br />damages when they do occur. <br /> <br />. Organize federal programs to provi~ the <br />support and the tools necessary for all levels of <br />government to carry out and participate in <br />effective floodplain management. <br /> <br />COMMITTEE FINDINGS: <br /> <br />In conducting the review, the Committee divided its findings into two areas: the Midwest Flood of 1993, and Federal, <br />State, Tribal, and Local Floodplain Management. <br /> <br />The Midwest Flood of 1993 <br /> <br />In reviewing the Midwest Flood of 1993, the <br />Committee found that: <br /> <br />hydrometeorological event unprecedented in recent <br />times. It was caused by excessive rainfall that occurred <br />throughout a significant section of the upper Mississippi <br />River Basin, The damaging impacts of this rainfall and <br /> <br />. The Midwest Flood of 1993 was a <br /> <br />viii <br /> <br />j <br /> <br />