Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OM SOO-I-6 <br />January 1991 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />b. Improved Channels Constructed for Flood Control Purposes, An improved <br />channel constructed for flood control is considered a flood control works under <br />the intent of PL 84-99 and the Corps is authorized to conduct major protectiv0 <br />and flood fight effort wh"n the situation exceeds local capability, <br /> <br />10, Irril?:ation Facilitie.,. Irrigation facilities are not normally considtel'ed <br />flood protection works under PL 84-99, In some instances the banks of irrigation <br />canals also serve as levees to prevent flooding of improved property by rises <br />in streams or rivers, In these instances the canal bank is a flood protective <br />work. Flooding which results from irrigation water flowing from breaks in ditch <br />banks may necessitate Corps floodfight assistance including furnishing technical <br />assistance, sandbags and other supplies. Irrigation divers ion dams in some <br />instances contribute to flood control systems by permitting diversion of water <br />to reduce flood peaks. Unusual conditions would be necessary to justify Corps <br />of Engineers assistance in furnishing pre flood protection for irrigation <br />diversions. The Corps of Engineers is authorized to protect irrigation <br />facilities during a flood fight if the situation exceeds local capability and <br />if protection is feasible. <br /> <br />11. Bank Cuttin? and Er08ion of Land. Bank cutting and erosion of land occurs <br />in streams which are unimproved, This is a natural process and Corps assistance <br />under PL 84-99 is not normally authorized. Temporary emergency work during a <br />flood fight may be undertaken by the Corps if the erosion threatens valuable <br />improved property or is a, threat to life, Existing statutory authority under . <br />Section 14 of the Flood Control Act approved 24 July 1946 (Emergency Bank <br />Protection) or Section 208 of the Flood Control Act approved 3 September 1954 <br />(Clearing and Snagging for Flood Control) may be applicable if the potential <br />benefits will exceed the cost of the work, A letter of application to the <br />District Engineer is required to initiate a preliminary investigation under these <br />authorities. <br /> <br />12. Ice Jams. Ice jams rarely occur on rivers in the Albuquerque District but <br />must be considered a possibility. In 1962 an ice jam on the Rio Grande caused <br />some flooding at San Felipe Pueblo in New Mexico. A bridge across the Rio Grande <br />at this location was endangered at the same time as uplifting pressure from the <br />ice threatened to raise the bridge from its abutments. Removal of ice jams is <br />difficult. Blasting is not very successful since the ice often extends over a <br />reach several miles in length, Also if blasting suddenly releases the trapped <br />water, severe downstream flooding can result, Corps policy is that ice jam <br />removal is a local flood measure responsibility, Corps support is to be limited <br />to technical advice and engineering assistance. <br /> <br />2 Encl <br />Appendix A <br />Appendix B <br />DISTRIBUTION: <br />By Emergency Management Branch <br /> <br /> <br />STEVEN M. DOUGAN <br />LTC, EN <br />Commanding <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />8 <br />