Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />along the study reach in different combinations. The first terrain ope consists of a steep, <br />confined channel bordered by mediwn to dense willows and rocky side slopes, which transition <br />steeply to either the adjacent county road or to steep forested slopes. The second terrain l)pe <br />consists of a more open river corridor; the channel is bordered by dense \\iIl0\\'5 with relatively <br />flat Q\'erbanks of primarily shon grass meadows. which also transition to steep forested slopes. <br />but at a greater distance from the main channel. Photographic documentation of the study area <br />is included in Appendix C. A summary of the general owrbank ground cover types and their <br />associated Manning's n values are included in Table 4.1. <br /> <br />Table ~.l Summar)' of Ground Cover T):pes and j\.tanning's Rou2hness Coefficients <br />for OHrbank Areas along the Soulh Platte Rin'r. <br /> <br />O\-'erbank Ground COHr Type :\tanning's Roughness Coefficients <br />County Road (Paved) 0.020 <br />Short Grass Meadow 0.035 to 0.045 <br />Steep Forested Slopes 0.070 to 0,10 <br />Dense Willows 0.10 <br /> <br />Included \\ith the general assessment of channel and overbank conditions was the <br />definition onvlanning's roughness coefficients (n values) for charmels and overbanks throughout <br />the study reach. The assignment of Manning's n values for the channels was based on the <br />application of Cowan's Method [Chow, 1959]. Manning's n values for the overbank areas were <br />defined based on generally accepted roughness coefficients for shallow flow areas given <br />observed ground cover and approximate flov,,' depths, with adjustments made to account for <br />obstructions and other ground conditions influencing relative roughness and effective <br />conveyance. Subsequent to field reconnaissance efforts and the determination of roughness <br />coefticients, it became evident that the ~'fanning's n values used in the USGSfFIS hydraulic <br />model were not unifonnly consistent \\ith field conditions observed in 2004. Consequently, <br />channel and overbank Manning's n values for select cross sections \\ithin the USGSfFIS reach <br />near Deckers were revised based on field observations of adjacent reaches and an e\"aluation of <br />color aerial photographs. <br />It was determined that channel \lanning's n values range from 0.040 to 0.050 within the <br />study reach: overbank n values vary from 0.035 to 0.10, except for an n value of 0.020 for the <br />county road which often parallels the river. Horizontal variations in ~lanning"s n values were <br />detined for cross sections \\ilh overbank areas where more than one type of ground cover is <br />present. A summary of roughness coefficients defined by the current study for all cross sections <br />\\ithin the South Plane River study reach is provided in Table 4.2. Detailed information <br /> <br />CQCWCBOJ_South PlaueJepon doc <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />A,dERSO' eo,s",hhG E'Ghwt\, he. <br />