Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1623.001 <br /> <br />PREVIOUS STUDY REVIEW <br /> <br />SPRING CREEK HYDROLOGY REPORTS <br /> <br />January 23, 1980 <br /> <br />Several studies have been prepared for the Spring Creek basin in the <br />last 20 yea.rs. The object of this \~ork ~Ias to establish runoff quantities <br />for design of flood plain improvements. The first tl'/O reports dealt with <br />storm frequencies with recurrence intervals from 10-50 years. Runoff <br />was calculated using the Rational method. The later reports used a <br />more sophisticated form of storm runoff analysis, the CUHP model formulated <br />for the Denver area. The later reports also adopted a lOO-year frequency <br />storm event for the basis of alternative improvement design. Starting <br />with the Black and Veatch report in 1971, the area north of the basin <br />was expected to contribute flow to Spring Creek. Through the use of <br />irrigation canals, water was to be imported into the basin, thereby <br />relieving downtown Fort Collins of these flood discharges. <br /> <br />There are no stream-gaging stations in the basin or on similar streams <br />in the area. Therefore, hydrological analysis is based on methods using <br />rainfall intensity and soil characteristics. <br /> <br />Shown in Table 1 is a list of past reports published on Spring Creek <br />Basin flood hydrology. A brief summary of each report is a part of this <br />review report. The purpose is to make use of past information, eliminate <br />duplication and continue to build upon this data. <br />