Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2.4 Flood Protection Measures <br /> <br />The possibility of future flood damage in the upper Cherry Creek <br />area has been somewhat reduced by the construction of 32 flood- <br />water-retarding structures. The SCS completed construction of <br />these structures in 1965 as part of an overall plan (Reference 4). <br />These structures were designed for an agricultural community with <br />design floods having a 25-year recurrence interval. <br /> <br />3.0 <br /> <br />ENGINEERING METHODS <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />For the flooding sources studied in detail in the community, standard <br />hydrologic and hydraulic study methods were used to determine the flood <br />hazard data required for this study. Flood events of a magnitude which <br />are expected to be equaled or exceeded once on the average during any <br />10-, 50-, 100-, or 500-year period (recurrence interval) have been <br />selected as having special significance for flood plain management and <br />for flood insurance rates. These events, commonly termed the 10-, 50-, <br />100-, and 500-year floods, have a 10, 2, 1, and 0.2 percent chance, <br />respectively, of being equaled or exceeded during any year. Although <br />,the recurrence interval represents the long-term average period between <br />floods of a specific magnitude, rare floods could occur at short <br />intervals or even within the same year. The risk of experiencing a rare <br />flood increases when periods greater than 1 year are considered. For <br />example, the risk of having a flood which equals or exceeds the 100-year <br />flood (1 percent chance of annual exceedence) in any 50-year period is <br />approximately 40 percent (4 in 10), and, for any 90-year period, the <br />risk increases to approximately 60 percent (6 in 10). The analyses <br />reported herein reflect flooding potentials based on conditions existing <br />in the community at the time of completion of this study. Maps and <br />flood elevations will be amended periodically to reflect future changes. <br /> <br />3.1 Hydrologic Analyses <br /> <br />Hydrologic analyses were carried out to establish the peak <br />discharge-frequency relationships for each flooding source studied <br />in detail affecting the community. <br /> <br />For Sulphur and Tallman Gulches; the synthetic hydrograph method <br />was used to obtain the peak rates of runoff. The analyses were <br />based on a storm duration of 24 hours and a Type II A distribu- <br />tion, as described in the SCS National Engineerinq Handbook <br />(Reference 5). The amount of rainfall was obtained from Volume <br />III of the Precipitation-Frequency Atlas of the Western United <br />States (Reference 6), and an areal adjustment was applied to <br />convert the point precipitation values to average precipitation <br />over the watershed area. Hydrologic soil cover complexes and <br />associated Runoff Curve Numbers were obtained from field inves- <br />tigations, a soil survey of Castle Rock (Reference 7), an <br /> <br />7 <br />